• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Canon 18X50 IS Binoculars (1 Viewer)

gfletcher

New member
Hi guys
I have recently acquired a pair of Canon 18X50 IS binoculars and was looking for your views as to how suitable they maybe for bird watching.
thanks
Graham
 
A steady, handheld 18x view of birds is quite nice, but they are, for most people, too heavy to carry around in the field much. Their narrow field can make birds a bit hard to spot and follow around, but experience helps some. They also have very poor focus, 6m (19.7'), which can be a problem in some situations.

I sometimes leave my 15x50s where they are handy to check the birds at my feeders. They are not my choice when I am wandering around looking for birds.

Clear skies, Alan
 
I sometimes use mine for birding when I wanna have a closer look. But I don't use them quite as much as I had thought I would. I bought them mainly for astronomy but for that purpose the weight is even more annoying than when holding them horizontally. The views are spectacular though. But my most used binos are in the 8x to 10x range.
 
They make a great spotting scope substitute. Get a sling strap, like an Op/Tech Utility Sling strap or a Vortex Archer's Strap and wear them cross body with a lower power binocular around your neck. That way, you can just swing them up when you need to make a long range ID. They are also great for shorebirds, raptors in flight and just close looks at waterfowl, etc. They are far easier to take on a long walk than a scope. I actually know an expert birder who uses a 15x50 IS for warblers. I wouldn't have even tried that, but it apparently works for her.
 
They have their use. A kookaburra sitting on the neighbour’s roof 50-250 meters away no better instrument to show maximum detail In plumage, the beak etc.

The downsides are many: heavy, poor fov, poor depth of field. More of an astronomy instrument for me.
 
They make a great spotting scope substitute.
No, they don't. In many, many situations 18x is too low. Scopes are commonly used at far higher magnifications. The Canons are a nice additional binocular, but they're no substitute for a scope.

Hermann
 
By spotting scope substitute I mean that if you are going on a long walk through a wetland or some other preserve and you don't want to lug a heavy scope and tripod around all morning, you can take the 18x50 instead. I will frequently wear an 8X or 10X bin around my neck and carry the 18x50 in a camera bag. It can also replace a spotting scope if you are in a car and don't want to get out and set up the scope. Also remember that your eyes can extract more detail from a view with both eyes than from one. I think I read that a 15X binocular shows as much detail as a 20X scope.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top