What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 1D MK II N or Canon 50D for birding?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CAU" data-source="post: 1331188" data-attributes="member: 55324"><p>I was mainly referring to the ability to focus on moving subjects in the AI servo mode.</p><p></p><p>You might want to read Rob Galbraith's opinion on the difference between the autofocus on the 1D series and on the 40D (scroll down to the question regarding the 40D):</p><p><a href="http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-8740-9068-9537" target="_blank">http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-8740-9068-9537</a></p><p></p><p>Some excerpts:</p><p>"With an EF 300mm f/2.8L IS or EF 500mm f/4L IS lens attached, the EOS 40D produces an unacceptably low percentage of properly focused or even usably focused frames of track events, soccer, rugby, football and basketball in our testing." </p><p></p><p>"A midrange digital SLR with a midrange price tag probably can't be expected to offer the same autofocus performance as the company's best. Even taking that into account, though, the 40D doesn't fare well. It's not that it can't do the job at the level of a more expensive camera, it's that it can't do the job really at all."</p><p></p><p>Rob Galbraith isn't just the average photographer, for example he was one of the first ones to note the AF issues on the Mk III, which then prompted new firmware releases from Canon:</p><p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0707/07072101canon1dmkiiifirmware.asp" target="_blank">http://www.dpreview.com/news/0707/07072101canon1dmkiiifirmware.asp</a></p><p></p><p>People who have changed from the XXD series to the 1D series say the same (at least those that I personally know), the autofocus of the midrange cameras isn't comparable to the performance of the 1D cameras. Certainly you can get some good flight shots with the cheaper cameras, too, especially if you photograph easy subjects, but the 40D just isn't an alternative to serious flight photography.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CAU, post: 1331188, member: 55324"] I was mainly referring to the ability to focus on moving subjects in the AI servo mode. You might want to read Rob Galbraith's opinion on the difference between the autofocus on the 1D series and on the 40D (scroll down to the question regarding the 40D): [url]http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-8740-9068-9537[/url] Some excerpts: "With an EF 300mm f/2.8L IS or EF 500mm f/4L IS lens attached, the EOS 40D produces an unacceptably low percentage of properly focused or even usably focused frames of track events, soccer, rugby, football and basketball in our testing." "A midrange digital SLR with a midrange price tag probably can't be expected to offer the same autofocus performance as the company's best. Even taking that into account, though, the 40D doesn't fare well. It's not that it can't do the job at the level of a more expensive camera, it's that it can't do the job really at all." Rob Galbraith isn't just the average photographer, for example he was one of the first ones to note the AF issues on the Mk III, which then prompted new firmware releases from Canon: [url]http://www.dpreview.com/news/0707/07072101canon1dmkiiifirmware.asp[/url] People who have changed from the XXD series to the 1D series say the same (at least those that I personally know), the autofocus of the midrange cameras isn't comparable to the performance of the 1D cameras. Certainly you can get some good flight shots with the cheaper cameras, too, especially if you photograph easy subjects, but the 40D just isn't an alternative to serious flight photography. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 1D MK II N or Canon 50D for birding?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top