What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 1D MK II N or Canon 50D for birding?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JGobeil" data-source="post: 1332187" data-attributes="member: 24649"><p>Nigel, this has been discussed in depth on many forums, DPP for one. Experts seem to agree that a C sensor is an advantage for birding. Of course, you must take into consideration the number of megapixels but there is a limit to cropping. Also, taking a picture with the intent do crop afterwards doesn't help for composition.</p><p></p><p>IMO, in birding we always need more reach. I like C sensors because of the 50-60% crop factor. I also like more megapixels because it allows for cropping if needed.</p><p></p><p>The drawback of the C sensor is an increased pixel density but of course "there's no free lunch". I am willing to pay that price for more reach - when a bird is too far, it is too far, no matter how good your camera is.</p><p></p><p>If course, this is just my opinion, for what it is worth <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JGobeil, post: 1332187, member: 24649"] Nigel, this has been discussed in depth on many forums, DPP for one. Experts seem to agree that a C sensor is an advantage for birding. Of course, you must take into consideration the number of megapixels but there is a limit to cropping. Also, taking a picture with the intent do crop afterwards doesn't help for composition. IMO, in birding we always need more reach. I like C sensors because of the 50-60% crop factor. I also like more megapixels because it allows for cropping if needed. The drawback of the C sensor is an increased pixel density but of course "there's no free lunch". I am willing to pay that price for more reach - when a bird is too far, it is too far, no matter how good your camera is. If course, this is just my opinion, for what it is worth ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 1D MK II N or Canon 50D for birding?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top