What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 1D MK II N or Canon 50D for birding?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gmax" data-source="post: 1352992" data-attributes="member: 33636"><p>Well, here's my tuppence again B <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>Don't know much about the 50D, apart from what I've been reading extensively in many forums and websites.</p><p> </p><p>My 20D failed again, so it was time for an upgrade. Same narrowed choice as you - and I went for the 1D Mark II N ... much pondering though (spending more money on a used, older model camera instead of getting a <em>cheaper</em> brand new state of art camera).</p><p> </p><p>Well, glad I did it ... I know the comparison is not fair (an old prosumer against a pro body), but here it goes:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">AF performance alone is worth the money (mind I use my 400 prime glued to a tc)! Did I say that AF is superb? Fast and accurate, even with very small in the frame subjects ... Paired to the naked 400mm prime, I guess there's no better BIF kit price-wise ...</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">metering: WOW! The amount of light I get now is far superior to the one I was used to ... unbelievable and unexpected! This is the sweetest surprise for a relative beginner as I am :t:</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">ISO is not bad, up to 800 it can be easily cleaned,</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">usability .. well, you have to learn (I miss so much the joystick!!!) how to use it best ...</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">AWB: very very good!</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">framerate: well, you know that ... a machinegun ...</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">etc etc</li> </ul><p>One last thing: I'd love to try the 50D, just to see how big is the leap from the 20D, but I'm sure that now I'd be <em>much much less</em> surprised.</p><p>Upgrading the body allowed me to squeeze the best out of my lens combo - since I couldn't afford THE lens upgrade - a choice which will keep me happy for a while:king:</p><p> </p><p>:loveme::bounce:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gmax, post: 1352992, member: 33636"] Well, here's my tuppence again B (: Don't know much about the 50D, apart from what I've been reading extensively in many forums and websites. My 20D failed again, so it was time for an upgrade. Same narrowed choice as you - and I went for the 1D Mark II N ... much pondering though (spending more money on a used, older model camera instead of getting a [I]cheaper[/I] brand new state of art camera). Well, glad I did it ... I know the comparison is not fair (an old prosumer against a pro body), but here it goes: [LIST] [*]AF performance alone is worth the money (mind I use my 400 prime glued to a tc)! Did I say that AF is superb? Fast and accurate, even with very small in the frame subjects ... Paired to the naked 400mm prime, I guess there's no better BIF kit price-wise ... [*]metering: WOW! The amount of light I get now is far superior to the one I was used to ... unbelievable and unexpected! This is the sweetest surprise for a relative beginner as I am :t: [*]ISO is not bad, up to 800 it can be easily cleaned, [*]usability .. well, you have to learn (I miss so much the joystick!!!) how to use it best ... [*]AWB: very very good! [*]framerate: well, you know that ... a machinegun ... [*]etc etc[/LIST]One last thing: I'd love to try the 50D, just to see how big is the leap from the 20D, but I'm sure that now I'd be [I]much much less[/I] surprised. Upgrading the body allowed me to squeeze the best out of my lens combo - since I couldn't afford THE lens upgrade - a choice which will keep me happy for a while:king: :loveme::bounce: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 1D MK II N or Canon 50D for birding?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top