What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 1D MK II N or Canon 50D for birding?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kevindurose" data-source="post: 1354752" data-attributes="member: 8155"><p>I dont own either a 50d or a 1d MkII, however I do own a 1ds MkII and a 40d. My advice would be to go for the pro camera, although the mk II has less pixels compared to the 50d, the focus is far superior in the Mk II in A1servo, in my opinion its practically useless on the 40d for fast moving birds, although you do get the odd sharp picture. The other advantage of the MkII is that you can still get auto focus using a 1.4 convertor. As its been said on this forum many times there is a limit to the number of pixels its worth having, as we are ultimatley limited by the resolution delivered by the camera lens. Doubling the number of pixels in the camera aint gonna to give you twice the resolution in your photograph if the pixels are recording blurred or distorted light. To be honest i'm considering selling my 40d to help fund a 1d mkII because getting 1ds mkII has been a real eye opener, there is just no comparison between the XXD and the pro camera.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kevindurose, post: 1354752, member: 8155"] I dont own either a 50d or a 1d MkII, however I do own a 1ds MkII and a 40d. My advice would be to go for the pro camera, although the mk II has less pixels compared to the 50d, the focus is far superior in the Mk II in A1servo, in my opinion its practically useless on the 40d for fast moving birds, although you do get the odd sharp picture. The other advantage of the MkII is that you can still get auto focus using a 1.4 convertor. As its been said on this forum many times there is a limit to the number of pixels its worth having, as we are ultimatley limited by the resolution delivered by the camera lens. Doubling the number of pixels in the camera aint gonna to give you twice the resolution in your photograph if the pixels are recording blurred or distorted light. To be honest i'm considering selling my 40d to help fund a 1d mkII because getting 1ds mkII has been a real eye opener, there is just no comparison between the XXD and the pro camera. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 1D MK II N or Canon 50D for birding?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top