What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 400 f/5.6L or Nikon (!) 200-500 f/5.6 ED VR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HermitIbis" data-source="post: 3502802" data-attributes="member: 128291"><p>So you are unsure which path you should take: </p><p>- a 400mm prime which is best to insulate a bird against a pleasing background ("bokeh"), or a zoom (flexibility)</p><p>- Canon or Nikon</p><p>- short focusing distance, weight, price... and not to forget ISO!</p><p></p><p>Why do you not consider "mirrorless" cameras as another option and post your question in those threads, too? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>Many of those offer silent shooting, electronic shutter (as opposed to DSLR shutters that break after 130,000 photos or so). </p><p></p><p>At the end the key question is what is most important to you. Which kind of photos do you want to take that are totally different from your present practice? I have been where you stand now (Canon 650D, a 300mm zoom and a 1.5x teleconverter), bought a cheap 400mm prime (the Sigma APO macro) to see whether it made a huge difference (not really, it is great in some respects, frustrating in others). Finally I decided that in 2016 my priority would be "birds in flight". So I bought a Nikon V2 and the 70-300CX lens. I've posted <a href="http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=324405" target="_blank">about my experiences in the Nikon section.</a> </p><p></p><p>Lens + V2 cost about Euro 800 (used), it's 810mm (equivalent), weight below 1kg. [There is an option to use the Nikon 200-500 lens (with the FT-1 adapter), an equivalent of 1350mm.] You'll get silence, reduced weight, fast autofocus at 15, 30 or 60 fps, a buffer of 40 photos (RAW) vs the 6 photos with the 650D. Occasionally I still use my Canon DSLR, because the results with the 400mm prime are ... different, and yes, they are pleasing. But on most days I use the Nikon V2.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HermitIbis, post: 3502802, member: 128291"] So you are unsure which path you should take: - a 400mm prime which is best to insulate a bird against a pleasing background ("bokeh"), or a zoom (flexibility) - Canon or Nikon - short focusing distance, weight, price... and not to forget ISO! Why do you not consider "mirrorless" cameras as another option and post your question in those threads, too? ;) Many of those offer silent shooting, electronic shutter (as opposed to DSLR shutters that break after 130,000 photos or so). At the end the key question is what is most important to you. Which kind of photos do you want to take that are totally different from your present practice? I have been where you stand now (Canon 650D, a 300mm zoom and a 1.5x teleconverter), bought a cheap 400mm prime (the Sigma APO macro) to see whether it made a huge difference (not really, it is great in some respects, frustrating in others). Finally I decided that in 2016 my priority would be "birds in flight". So I bought a Nikon V2 and the 70-300CX lens. I've posted [URL="http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=324405"]about my experiences in the Nikon section.[/URL] Lens + V2 cost about Euro 800 (used), it's 810mm (equivalent), weight below 1kg. [There is an option to use the Nikon 200-500 lens (with the FT-1 adapter), an equivalent of 1350mm.] You'll get silence, reduced weight, fast autofocus at 15, 30 or 60 fps, a buffer of 40 photos (RAW) vs the 6 photos with the 650D. Occasionally I still use my Canon DSLR, because the results with the 400mm prime are ... different, and yes, they are pleasing. But on most days I use the Nikon V2. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 400 f/5.6L or Nikon (!) 200-500 f/5.6 ED VR
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top