What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 400 f/5.6L or Nikon (!) 200-500 f/5.6 ED VR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HermitIbis" data-source="post: 3503848" data-attributes="member: 128291"><p>I see where your priorities lie and wish you find the perfect solution. Having used the Tamron 70-300 zoom for a while, the Sigma APO macro 400mm prime gave me more fun - sharp pictures, birds nicely separated from the background, and a short minimum focus distance of 1.60 meter. However, the weight of 1.40 kg was a little much to handhold - I am 57 years old and don't get younger. So I mostly used a monopod, and yes, it was a hassle. </p><p></p><p>Better noise performance would be nice, here my present gear was a step back. I looked at the DxO website comparing many cameras. To improve significantly upon the Canon 650D's iso isn't cheap, unfortunately. </p><p></p><p>Good luck.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HermitIbis, post: 3503848, member: 128291"] I see where your priorities lie and wish you find the perfect solution. Having used the Tamron 70-300 zoom for a while, the Sigma APO macro 400mm prime gave me more fun - sharp pictures, birds nicely separated from the background, and a short minimum focus distance of 1.60 meter. However, the weight of 1.40 kg was a little much to handhold - I am 57 years old and don't get younger. So I mostly used a monopod, and yes, it was a hassle. Better noise performance would be nice, here my present gear was a step back. I looked at the DxO website comparing many cameras. To improve significantly upon the Canon 650D's iso isn't cheap, unfortunately. Good luck. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 400 f/5.6L or Nikon (!) 200-500 f/5.6 ED VR
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top