What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 400 f/5.6L or Nikon (!) 200-500 f/5.6 ED VR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rapala" data-source="post: 3506450" data-attributes="member: 119536"><p>At this point I have decided to go with the Canon 400 f/5.6L, mainly because of price and weight. I've seen many fantastic images taken with it so I'm sure I will be happy with it. </p><p></p><p>A final question. I currently have a T4i and my biggest complaints are small buffer (resulting in slow continuous shooting combined with slow frame rate) and ISO performance. I am considering the Canon 7D (<strong>not</strong> MkII) as an upgrade. What do you think of this? Would the 7D be a worthy upgrade for birds over the T4i? Or would it be better to wait and go for a camera such as the 7D II/other? Thanks for your help!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rapala, post: 3506450, member: 119536"] At this point I have decided to go with the Canon 400 f/5.6L, mainly because of price and weight. I've seen many fantastic images taken with it so I'm sure I will be happy with it. A final question. I currently have a T4i and my biggest complaints are small buffer (resulting in slow continuous shooting combined with slow frame rate) and ISO performance. I am considering the Canon 7D ([B]not[/B] MkII) as an upgrade. What do you think of this? Would the 7D be a worthy upgrade for birds over the T4i? Or would it be better to wait and go for a camera such as the 7D II/other? Thanks for your help! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon 400 f/5.6L or Nikon (!) 200-500 f/5.6 ED VR
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
