What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Canon 450D + Skywatcher 80ED
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul Corfield" data-source="post: 1673655" data-attributes="member: 19132"><p>Yeah, that's with all that taken into account. </p><p></p><p>The way I personally work out the magnification is to shoot a stationary object with the scope at 600mm and no barlow. Then I use the barlow with a macro tube to increase the magnification and take another photo. In Photoshop I overlay the 600mm one onto the magnified one and make the 600mm one semi transparent by adjusting the layer transparency. Then using the percentages I increase the 600mm in size until it matches the photo taken with the barlow. The transparency allows you to see when they perfectly match. The percentage needed to get them to match up is your finial figure for the magnification. </p><p></p><p>For example if you had to increase the 600mm photo by 350% to match up with the barlow one then you know it's 3.5X bigger and the barlow in that position is giving 3.5X magnification. It's harder to describe than to actually do. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Paul.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul Corfield, post: 1673655, member: 19132"] Yeah, that's with all that taken into account. The way I personally work out the magnification is to shoot a stationary object with the scope at 600mm and no barlow. Then I use the barlow with a macro tube to increase the magnification and take another photo. In Photoshop I overlay the 600mm one onto the magnified one and make the 600mm one semi transparent by adjusting the layer transparency. Then using the percentages I increase the 600mm in size until it matches the photo taken with the barlow. The transparency allows you to see when they perfectly match. The percentage needed to get them to match up is your finial figure for the magnification. For example if you had to increase the 600mm photo by 350% to match up with the barlow one then you know it's 3.5X bigger and the barlow in that position is giving 3.5X magnification. It's harder to describe than to actually do. ;) Paul. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Canon 450D + Skywatcher 80ED
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top