What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Canon 450D + Skywatcher 80ED
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul Corfield" data-source="post: 1674304" data-attributes="member: 19132"><p>For ease of use the teleconverter works best because it's built for that sole purpose. I only have the 1.4X Kenko Pro 300. Above 1.4X I like to use the 2X GSO Barlow or the DOI 2X teleconverter that I modified. If I had the money I'd probably get the 2X Kenko Pro 300. Teleconverters are well corrected for contrast and colour balance where as the GSO 2X is a little behind. As far as detail goes they are all about the same. Telelconverters are quick to change so you can switch magnification very quickly which is another bonus. If you don't want the magnification from the GSO barlow then you have to unscrew it from the Max DSLR which could result in a missed photo.</p><p></p><p>I'll try and post up some photos tomorrow all taken with different things so you can see the difference. I'll post them all unmodified to give you a good idea of what to expect.</p><p></p><p>Paul.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul Corfield, post: 1674304, member: 19132"] For ease of use the teleconverter works best because it's built for that sole purpose. I only have the 1.4X Kenko Pro 300. Above 1.4X I like to use the 2X GSO Barlow or the DOI 2X teleconverter that I modified. If I had the money I'd probably get the 2X Kenko Pro 300. Teleconverters are well corrected for contrast and colour balance where as the GSO 2X is a little behind. As far as detail goes they are all about the same. Telelconverters are quick to change so you can switch magnification very quickly which is another bonus. If you don't want the magnification from the GSO barlow then you have to unscrew it from the Max DSLR which could result in a missed photo. I'll try and post up some photos tomorrow all taken with different things so you can see the difference. I'll post them all unmodified to give you a good idea of what to expect. Paul. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Canon 450D + Skywatcher 80ED
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top