What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon 8x25 IS brief test
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3144033" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>The rain we've had for a few days has stopped and after a very foggy start it cleared after lunch and I tried a few readings. The ambient light (needed to contract the pupil) and target illumination (contrast) where way below what I would normally use for testing, but with little prospect of an improvement in the next few days I thought I'd post the results anyway.</p><p></p><p>I initially used 10.5m, but the light (and results) improved a little to about 2000 lux when I had moved the chart to 28.5m and it's those I'm reporting. I used two binoculars, my Zen Ray Prime 10x42 which I consider one of my steadier pairs in my hands and also my Vanguard Endeavour EDII 8x42 which I don't find so steady. In previous boosted test results the Vanguard gave slightly better full aperture and stopped down resolution results than the Zen Ray, but I would not expect to see any difference at these light levels.</p><p></p><p>Zen Ray Prime 10x42</p><p></p><p>Tripod mounted, pattern 0,1 @ 28.5m which gives 7.2" (apparent VA 72")</p><p>Hand Held, -1,4@ 28.5m which gives 10.2" (apparent VA 102")</p><p></p><p>I should say that I felt I was struggling with the light levels and taking longer to decide a reading than I normally would, though still kept within the minute Kimmo suggested. The Tripod mounted apparent VA is about what I expected but the hand held is worse. This works out as a 42% decrease in apparent VA which is a rather larger difference than I've previously seen for this binocular.</p><p></p><p>Vanguard Endeavour EDII 8x42</p><p></p><p>Tripod mounted, -1,4 @ 28.5m which gives 10.2". (apparent VA 81.6")</p><p>Hand Held, -1,1 @ 28.4m which gives 14.5" (apparent VA 14.5 116")</p><p></p><p>This again works out as a 42% decrease in apparent VA which is only a little more than I've seen previously. The light had dropped a little more by the time I did this test.</p><p></p><p>I intend to repeat this, if or when we get better weather.</p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3144033, member: 83808"] The rain we've had for a few days has stopped and after a very foggy start it cleared after lunch and I tried a few readings. The ambient light (needed to contract the pupil) and target illumination (contrast) where way below what I would normally use for testing, but with little prospect of an improvement in the next few days I thought I'd post the results anyway. I initially used 10.5m, but the light (and results) improved a little to about 2000 lux when I had moved the chart to 28.5m and it's those I'm reporting. I used two binoculars, my Zen Ray Prime 10x42 which I consider one of my steadier pairs in my hands and also my Vanguard Endeavour EDII 8x42 which I don't find so steady. In previous boosted test results the Vanguard gave slightly better full aperture and stopped down resolution results than the Zen Ray, but I would not expect to see any difference at these light levels. Zen Ray Prime 10x42 Tripod mounted, pattern 0,1 @ 28.5m which gives 7.2" (apparent VA 72") Hand Held, -1,4@ 28.5m which gives 10.2" (apparent VA 102") I should say that I felt I was struggling with the light levels and taking longer to decide a reading than I normally would, though still kept within the minute Kimmo suggested. The Tripod mounted apparent VA is about what I expected but the hand held is worse. This works out as a 42% decrease in apparent VA which is a rather larger difference than I've previously seen for this binocular. Vanguard Endeavour EDII 8x42 Tripod mounted, -1,4 @ 28.5m which gives 10.2". (apparent VA 81.6") Hand Held, -1,1 @ 28.4m which gives 14.5" (apparent VA 14.5 116") This again works out as a 42% decrease in apparent VA which is only a little more than I've seen previously. The light had dropped a little more by the time I did this test. I intend to repeat this, if or when we get better weather. David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon 8x25 IS brief test
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top