What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon 8x25 IS brief test
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3146637" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>Kimmo,</p><p></p><p>We got some good sunshine at about 1 o'clock today that if anything was a little high for my optimum acuity producing 500 cd/m2 at the target. It's probably the best I'm going to get this time of year and although I didn't quite match my best ever results for these binoculars the results are much more in keeping with previous results in good light levels.</p><p></p><p>I included my Eden 10x56 in today's test. I know that technically not one of my best and in optimum light conditions it is marginally limiting on my eyesight under test conditions. However that is perfectly adequate in most light conditions, and I think very good in low light. ( A similar argument was put forward by Zeiss in defence of the HT 8x54 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> )</p><p></p><p>Zen-Ray Prime 10x42</p><p>Tripod mounted, pattern 0,4 @ 21.7m which gives 6.74" (apparent VA 67")</p><p>Hand Held, 0,2@ 21.7m which gives 8.5" (apparent VA 85") or 27% worse.</p><p></p><p>Eden XP 10x56</p><p>Tripod Mounted, pattern 0,3@21.7m which gives 7.5" (apparent VA 75")</p><p>Hand held,pattern 0,1@21.7m which gives 9.5" (apparent VA 95") or 27% worse.</p><p></p><p>Vanguard Endeavour EDII 8x42</p><p>Tripod mounted, pattern 0,3@21.7m which gives 7.5" (apparent VA 60")</p><p>Hand Held, pattern -1,6@21.7m which gives 10.7" (apparent VA 85.6") or 43% worse.</p><p></p><p>On this occasion despite being the Vanguard being the 'sharpest' binocular to my eyes,the hand shake caused a proportionally higher decrease in apparent VA than the two 10x binoculars. I consider the Prime to be slightly steadier and sharper than the Eden and this is reflected in the results. However with the Eden I have learned to counter the increased shake if held normally with a forward and back hand hold, otherwise it would have faired quite badly.</p><p></p><p>Kimmo, unless you have any further proposals for other comparisons I'll call it a day on this exercise. One thing I've learned is that light levels have a greater role on the affect of hand shake on apparent VA than I've realised. It will be interesting to hear how the Canon compares.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3146637, member: 83808"] Kimmo, We got some good sunshine at about 1 o'clock today that if anything was a little high for my optimum acuity producing 500 cd/m2 at the target. It's probably the best I'm going to get this time of year and although I didn't quite match my best ever results for these binoculars the results are much more in keeping with previous results in good light levels. I included my Eden 10x56 in today's test. I know that technically not one of my best and in optimum light conditions it is marginally limiting on my eyesight under test conditions. However that is perfectly adequate in most light conditions, and I think very good in low light. ( A similar argument was put forward by Zeiss in defence of the HT 8x54 ;) ) Zen-Ray Prime 10x42 Tripod mounted, pattern 0,4 @ 21.7m which gives 6.74" (apparent VA 67") Hand Held, 0,2@ 21.7m which gives 8.5" (apparent VA 85") or 27% worse. Eden XP 10x56 Tripod Mounted, pattern 0,3@21.7m which gives 7.5" (apparent VA 75") Hand held,pattern 0,1@21.7m which gives 9.5" (apparent VA 95") or 27% worse. Vanguard Endeavour EDII 8x42 Tripod mounted, pattern 0,3@21.7m which gives 7.5" (apparent VA 60") Hand Held, pattern -1,6@21.7m which gives 10.7" (apparent VA 85.6") or 43% worse. On this occasion despite being the Vanguard being the 'sharpest' binocular to my eyes,the hand shake caused a proportionally higher decrease in apparent VA than the two 10x binoculars. I consider the Prime to be slightly steadier and sharper than the Eden and this is reflected in the results. However with the Eden I have learned to counter the increased shake if held normally with a forward and back hand hold, otherwise it would have faired quite badly. Kimmo, unless you have any further proposals for other comparisons I'll call it a day on this exercise. One thing I've learned is that light levels have a greater role on the affect of hand shake on apparent VA than I've realised. It will be interesting to hear how the Canon compares. Cheers, David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon 8x25 IS brief test
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top