What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon 8x25 IS brief test
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OPTIC_NUT" data-source="post: 3148610" data-attributes="member: 121951"><p>Some 'ballpark' figures:</p><p>---human acuity (well illuminated) is usually around 60 arc-seconds</p><p>---30 arc-seconds is rare but has happened</p><p>So, 10-power with 6 arc-seconds actual (60 apparent) resolution would be the limit for most people</p><p> (as far as what the thing has to do)</p><p>3 arc-seconds actual would be the point past which no-one can tell.</p><p></p><p>That said, I have seen airplane details lower than that myself.</p><p>I'm guessing larger detail can actually be guessed at to finer detail than point seperation,</p><p> assuming the cortex is doing a sort of line-fit or curve-fit.</p><p></p><p>If you want to see if the instrument resolves finer than your eye can use, use a static</p><p>target, mount, and a low-powered monocular at the eyepiece. I found a 6x does OK,</p><p>though a 2x or 4x multiplier is brighter and less fussy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OPTIC_NUT, post: 3148610, member: 121951"] Some 'ballpark' figures: ---human acuity (well illuminated) is usually around 60 arc-seconds ---30 arc-seconds is rare but has happened So, 10-power with 6 arc-seconds actual (60 apparent) resolution would be the limit for most people (as far as what the thing has to do) 3 arc-seconds actual would be the point past which no-one can tell. That said, I have seen airplane details lower than that myself. I'm guessing larger detail can actually be guessed at to finer detail than point seperation, assuming the cortex is doing a sort of line-fit or curve-fit. If you want to see if the instrument resolves finer than your eye can use, use a static target, mount, and a low-powered monocular at the eyepiece. I found a 6x does OK, though a 2x or 4x multiplier is brighter and less fussy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon 8x25 IS brief test
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top