What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon 8x25 IS brief test
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3150413" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>. Thank you Kimmo and David.</p><p></p><p>David, regarding reading the aircraft letters, the whole point is that you were looking for letters to read.</p><p></p><p>When I was looking at the aircraft, I was definitely not looking for letters or a name.</p><p>When I pressed the stabiliser button of the 2014 build Canon 8×25 IS the name ETIHAD magically appeared in large letters which had colour. This rather amazed me as it was so easy to read that I could not believe that I'd missed it without the stabiliser. But with the stabiliser off I actually could not read it probably because it was moving and I had to track the aircraft.</p><p></p><p>I think that you are both doing excellent work in measuring and quantifying the results with and without a tripod and with the stabiliser and a Finnstick.</p><p></p><p>Also observations are very personal and mine are mainly non-bird related. I'm usually panning with the binocular, which also highlights the difference between a stabilised and non-stabilised binocular.</p><p></p><p>David, I'm not really happy with the photographs of that pimple as it is at the limit of the camera I was using and there is some irradiation at the edges. At a later date I hope to take better photographs with a more capable camera or perhaps using a telescope.</p><p></p><p>Incidentally, today when I was out in the street I saw a protected unaided eyes sunspot, which I estimated as 39 arc seconds penumbral diameter. It took about eight seconds to see and confirm it. I suspected it probably after three seconds.</p><p>It was favourably placed though just below centre disc. Seeing protected unaided eyes sunspots near the Sun's limb is very difficult because of crowding.</p><p>Nowadays, when my eyes are tired I cannot see fine detail but today my eyes were rested.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3150413, member: 111403"] . Thank you Kimmo and David. David, regarding reading the aircraft letters, the whole point is that you were looking for letters to read. When I was looking at the aircraft, I was definitely not looking for letters or a name. When I pressed the stabiliser button of the 2014 build Canon 8×25 IS the name ETIHAD magically appeared in large letters which had colour. This rather amazed me as it was so easy to read that I could not believe that I'd missed it without the stabiliser. But with the stabiliser off I actually could not read it probably because it was moving and I had to track the aircraft. I think that you are both doing excellent work in measuring and quantifying the results with and without a tripod and with the stabiliser and a Finnstick. Also observations are very personal and mine are mainly non-bird related. I'm usually panning with the binocular, which also highlights the difference between a stabilised and non-stabilised binocular. David, I'm not really happy with the photographs of that pimple as it is at the limit of the camera I was using and there is some irradiation at the edges. At a later date I hope to take better photographs with a more capable camera or perhaps using a telescope. Incidentally, today when I was out in the street I saw a protected unaided eyes sunspot, which I estimated as 39 arc seconds penumbral diameter. It took about eight seconds to see and confirm it. I suspected it probably after three seconds. It was favourably placed though just below centre disc. Seeing protected unaided eyes sunspots near the Sun's limb is very difficult because of crowding. Nowadays, when my eyes are tired I cannot see fine detail but today my eyes were rested. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon 8x25 IS brief test
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top