What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon IS 18x50
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Purcell" data-source="post: 1513065" data-attributes="member: 68323"><p>I think the 10X30 were the start of the second wave of Canon IS bins. They Porro 2 wave which all seem to share the same "back half": same 3mm exit pupil size with the same EPs, prisms, and stabilization wedge.</p><p></p><p>The first wave were roof prism based: 15x45 and the (original) 12x36</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think part of it is looks. They do look weird. That's the problem with Porro 2 bins with the EPs on stalks.</p><p></p><p>Then the strap attachment to the EP. Heck that's going to break. Clearly.</p><p></p><p>Until you use them. Then they make sense. </p><p></p><p>They also hold funny with the eye's above the objectives I find they knock of my sense of targeting for other bins (or my other bins targeting muscle memory doesn't transfer directly). This would be bad in a store: "Heck, I can't point them. Must be broken".</p><p></p><p>BTW, the miltary or thumbs up grip I find works very well for pointing these in the same way as my non-IS bins.</p><p></p><p>I've seen two Canon IS 10x42 L in the field in Seattle but no other 10x30. Perhaps there's a more geeky population here. I saw my first SE (well, other than mine) around the neck of a birder yesterday.</p><p></p><p>My 10x30 IS are now my preferred bin (even over my Zen Ray and other more expensive bins) despire the small exit pupil. Well it's (mostly) dry now. I keep having to resist getting the 10x42 ... but I suspect that will last until it start raining because I will "need" them to be waterproof.</p><p></p><p>Do they work in real life? Heck yes. I was out hunting rare (for this location) birds yesterday and for canopy birds especially flitty ones the 10x and IS works great. Great view of a distant Indigo Bunting on the top of a tree singing and a very very flitty Least Flycatcher (I know it was because I could see it singing ... and I could hear the song) in a canopy. And even a very flitty pair of American Redstarts (which don't really come to the PNW!). So for any sort of "semi-distant" views they really do help because the bird stops moving around and you can easily see the little details. Another example, Red Crossbills ... yes, they're really crossbills I can see the tip of the bill (on a distant bird).</p><p></p><p>One can also see the FOV versus magnification trade off pretty clearly. Magnification isn't all especially in a lot of environments I'm in. So make the decision carefully.</p><p></p><p>The one other bin I can see needing along side the 10x IS bin is a very good 7x for times when the 10x FOV is just too narrow. Close in forest work. Or close in flitty birds that need to be tracked.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Purcell, post: 1513065, member: 68323"] I think the 10X30 were the start of the second wave of Canon IS bins. They Porro 2 wave which all seem to share the same "back half": same 3mm exit pupil size with the same EPs, prisms, and stabilization wedge. The first wave were roof prism based: 15x45 and the (original) 12x36 I think part of it is looks. They do look weird. That's the problem with Porro 2 bins with the EPs on stalks. Then the strap attachment to the EP. Heck that's going to break. Clearly. Until you use them. Then they make sense. They also hold funny with the eye's above the objectives I find they knock of my sense of targeting for other bins (or my other bins targeting muscle memory doesn't transfer directly). This would be bad in a store: "Heck, I can't point them. Must be broken". BTW, the miltary or thumbs up grip I find works very well for pointing these in the same way as my non-IS bins. I've seen two Canon IS 10x42 L in the field in Seattle but no other 10x30. Perhaps there's a more geeky population here. I saw my first SE (well, other than mine) around the neck of a birder yesterday. My 10x30 IS are now my preferred bin (even over my Zen Ray and other more expensive bins) despire the small exit pupil. Well it's (mostly) dry now. I keep having to resist getting the 10x42 ... but I suspect that will last until it start raining because I will "need" them to be waterproof. Do they work in real life? Heck yes. I was out hunting rare (for this location) birds yesterday and for canopy birds especially flitty ones the 10x and IS works great. Great view of a distant Indigo Bunting on the top of a tree singing and a very very flitty Least Flycatcher (I know it was because I could see it singing ... and I could hear the song) in a canopy. And even a very flitty pair of American Redstarts (which don't really come to the PNW!). So for any sort of "semi-distant" views they really do help because the bird stops moving around and you can easily see the little details. Another example, Red Crossbills ... yes, they're really crossbills I can see the tip of the bill (on a distant bird). One can also see the FOV versus magnification trade off pretty clearly. Magnification isn't all especially in a lot of environments I'm in. So make the decision carefully. The one other bin I can see needing along side the 10x IS bin is a very good 7x for times when the 10x FOV is just too narrow. Close in forest work. Or close in flitty birds that need to be tracked. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon IS 18x50
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top