What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon IS Zoom Bins?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spyglass" data-source="post: 1628314" data-attributes="member: 18470"><p>Well, Ron, if I remember right, I got the IS in about Apr of 03. Actually, it's only on the left side that it's loose.....the rt has the button housing that kinda stabilizes things over there. When ya grasp it firmly, you can feel the armor gap a little. But remember, this thing has been used a lot. The eyecups cratered after about 2yrs of use, so were trimmed level with the ep's (just enuf where there's still a neoprene contact with my specs).</p><p></p><p>I wasn't inferring the Canon was superior to the Swaro....it's just that in the tests I was able to do (i.e., reading boat registration numbers across one of the fingers of a manmade lake at a laser-rangefinder measured 830 meters-letters usually no more that 4-5" tall-one glass could do nothing the other couldn't do equally well, braced across the hood of my pickup.) I chose the 15x version after trying the 12x & 18x as well, because it seemed the best combination of aperature & magnification. The 12, I don't think had quite enuf aperature for really long distance use, and the 18 I felt just stretched it a little too much, at least on the targets I was able to try in about a 15 min comparo. It also has the biggest exit pupil, which makes it more pleasant to use. The Swaro I felt was at a disadvantage due to relatively short eye relief (about 12-13mm).</p><p></p><p>I bought it even tho I had the 12xSE because I was doing a lot of lakeshore birding (I'm 2 blocks away) and often upon driving up to one of the observing spots I wanted to get into action quickly. If there was a stiff wind or gusts, the 12 required bracing or I had to dig the scope out. The 15 could go into action right now, and the IS could defeat most of the weather effects. (So my scope almost atrophied from disuse).</p><p></p><p>That's my story.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spyglass, post: 1628314, member: 18470"] Well, Ron, if I remember right, I got the IS in about Apr of 03. Actually, it's only on the left side that it's loose.....the rt has the button housing that kinda stabilizes things over there. When ya grasp it firmly, you can feel the armor gap a little. But remember, this thing has been used a lot. The eyecups cratered after about 2yrs of use, so were trimmed level with the ep's (just enuf where there's still a neoprene contact with my specs). I wasn't inferring the Canon was superior to the Swaro....it's just that in the tests I was able to do (i.e., reading boat registration numbers across one of the fingers of a manmade lake at a laser-rangefinder measured 830 meters-letters usually no more that 4-5" tall-one glass could do nothing the other couldn't do equally well, braced across the hood of my pickup.) I chose the 15x version after trying the 12x & 18x as well, because it seemed the best combination of aperature & magnification. The 12, I don't think had quite enuf aperature for really long distance use, and the 18 I felt just stretched it a little too much, at least on the targets I was able to try in about a 15 min comparo. It also has the biggest exit pupil, which makes it more pleasant to use. The Swaro I felt was at a disadvantage due to relatively short eye relief (about 12-13mm). I bought it even tho I had the 12xSE because I was doing a lot of lakeshore birding (I'm 2 blocks away) and often upon driving up to one of the observing spots I wanted to get into action quickly. If there was a stiff wind or gusts, the 12 required bracing or I had to dig the scope out. The 15 could go into action right now, and the IS could defeat most of the weather effects. (So my scope almost atrophied from disuse). That's my story. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
Canon IS Zoom Bins?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top