What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon Macro lenses on a budget
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Boy Wonder" data-source="post: 1493017" data-attributes="member: 66392"><p>Would like to indulge in some macro photography for both work and pleasure and hope to get some help if possible. The subjects I hope to capture would mainly consist of butterflies, dragonflies, moths and flowers to illustrate the varied wildlife on the reserve and encourage our visitors to look out for them. They will be printed off on A4 and displayed in the Visitor Centre. I may also take some interesting beetles and insects too but nohting overly small as I want the visitors to see looking for these species as fun and not a chore. I have a 1.5 converter and extension tubes for the 400 5.6 and wondering if and what effect they have on a macro and would they sway my decision away from either of my shortlisted Canon 100 2.8 and Tamron 90 2.8?</p><p></p><p>All help and advice greatly appreciated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Boy Wonder, post: 1493017, member: 66392"] Would like to indulge in some macro photography for both work and pleasure and hope to get some help if possible. The subjects I hope to capture would mainly consist of butterflies, dragonflies, moths and flowers to illustrate the varied wildlife on the reserve and encourage our visitors to look out for them. They will be printed off on A4 and displayed in the Visitor Centre. I may also take some interesting beetles and insects too but nohting overly small as I want the visitors to see looking for these species as fun and not a chore. I have a 1.5 converter and extension tubes for the 400 5.6 and wondering if and what effect they have on a macro and would they sway my decision away from either of my shortlisted Canon 100 2.8 and Tamron 90 2.8? All help and advice greatly appreciated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon Macro lenses on a budget
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top