• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Canon mki v mkii 70-200 f2.8 (1 Viewer)

south banker

Well-known member
Has anyone got experience or thoughts regarding the main difference between old & newish 70-200 f2.8 lens/lense?
My birding has taken a twist regarding photography (alot of walking)
So before i sell 300 2.8 mki & 500 f4 mki i will need to feel comfy with new lens..crikey this is the awkward bit on what to choose..how many times this "crops" up..so far im in a quandry as to go for 400 f5.6 or 200 f2.8 with 2x on..
If i even considered Tamron new long lens or Sigma or Canon 100-400 old or new or 300 f4 with 1.4x by the time i decided all the birds would of flown..
So main question is..whats the main difference in old & newish 70-200 f2.8 is?
Happy new year everyone
 

Dave Williams

Well-known member
Has anyone got an opinion or experience of 70-200 l is ii f2.8 used with a 2x as a birding lense?

I have !
Used with FX bodies 5D3 or 1DX .
It's a cracking lens but even with the 2.0x is too short for all but the closest of opportunities but that's not to say I haven't captured one or two acceptable (IMO) images using it.
I found AF to be pretty hot and the image sharp.
In the Tree Sparrow shot, the bird was probably only 15-20 feet away but a 60% crop shows pretty good detail. Anything a bit further away and you are not likely to have much other than record shots of small birds although with the 7D2 it might be a different proposition altogether with the extra crop factor.
A cheaper combination is the 400mm f5.6 with the 1.4TC that would give more reach but would lack the advantages and flexibility that the zoom gives you ( and you would have to use it with a 7d2,5D3 or 1Dx to AF at f8).
Wide open the 70-200 produces lovely portraits and a nice bokeh, as well as being perfect for larger animals on safari, or sports shots. It will even work well as a macro lens as the minimum focus distance is fairly short too.
 

Attachments

  • 2014-11-18 at 05-34-03.jpg
    2014-11-18 at 05-34-03.jpg
    53.1 KB · Views: 71
  • 2014-11-18 at 05-34-03crop.jpg
    2014-11-18 at 05-34-03crop.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 91

2slo

Well-known member
Has anyone got an opinion or experience of 70-200 l is ii f2.8 used with a 2x as a birding lense?

I've occasionally used this combination. I thought I'd taken some bird pics with it but all I could find was this shot, a 70% crop, which from my notes I was happy with:

9570234538_39c01ebb88_h.jpg

Apart from the flexibility of the 140-400mm zoom when so set up, it will AF on most Canon DSLRs (rather than the 400mm f/5.6 + 1.4x C which wont AF on anything but 1 series or a 5DIII). The 70-200mm also has the benefit of a great IS system, something I've often wished for on the 400mm f/5.6. You can get away with some really slow speeds and still retain sharpness when using it.
I've done more with the 70-200mm fitted with the 1.4xTC, which has great resolution for close birds, these were taken with that combination:

7543888462_b61eced1e6_h.jpg 7543892768_73330b3d33_h.jpg
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top