What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon or Sigma (300 f2.8)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="postcardcv" data-source="post: 1326514" data-attributes="member: 3294"><p>Before spending your money on a 300 f2.8 it's worth thinking about whether 600mm will satisfy your desire for reach. I use a 500 f4 with 1.4x most of the time and often would like even more. No matter what lens you use there are times when you'll want more reach. It's worth working out what you really want before spending your money. Unless handholding is a must then the Sigma 500 f4.5 would be worth a look. More reach and less cost that a Canon 300 f2.8, but you'll need to use a tripod to get the most out of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="postcardcv, post: 1326514, member: 3294"] Before spending your money on a 300 f2.8 it's worth thinking about whether 600mm will satisfy your desire for reach. I use a 500 f4 with 1.4x most of the time and often would like even more. No matter what lens you use there are times when you'll want more reach. It's worth working out what you really want before spending your money. Unless handholding is a must then the Sigma 500 f4.5 would be worth a look. More reach and less cost that a Canon 300 f2.8, but you'll need to use a tripod to get the most out of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Canon or Sigma (300 f2.8)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top