What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Celestron Regal 100 mm Spotting Scope Arrived Today
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 1705339" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>Ok, here's my 2 cents worth.</p><p></p><p>Your eyesight may be the limitation at 67x. To see the true resolution of a scope requires enough magnification so that the scope's resolution in arc seconds multiplied by the magnification is comfortably worse than your eyesight acuity. 1.57 x 67 = 105.19 arcsec. 20/20 vision is equal to 120 arcsec. Lots of people are better than that (on a good day my acuity is around 90 arcsec), but magnifying scope resolution to around 150-160 arcsec makes reading the resolution on the chart much easier for me. I would be inclined to use around 150x to test a 100mm scope using the USAF chart.</p><p></p><p>My experience testing many scopes with this chart is that the best ones show resolution of about 115/D, where D is the aperture of the scope in millimeters, so a "perfect" 100mm scope would measure about 1.15 arcsec. Birding scopes have design limitations that usually cause then to be considerably worse than that. The only birding scope I've measured that came close was the best of 3 Kowa 883's at 119/D. I would consider any birding scope better than 130/D to be a cherry sample. Average performance might fall between 130-140D. Anything worse than 135/D would normally not make me very happy, but there are other considerations in this case. Your scope may do better than 157/D once you measure it at higher magnification, but even if it doesn't improve the raw figure of 1.57 arcsec is as good as most specimens of expensive 80mm class birding scopes and at 67x it may present as much or more detail than your eye is capable of seeing anyway.</p><p></p><p>It might be interesting to experiment with some stop down masks. It's probable that the image through this scope will actually look cleaner and sharper when it is stopped down to 80-85mm, with no loss of detail and only a slight loss of brightness.</p><p></p><p>Henry</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 1705339, member: 6806"] Ok, here's my 2 cents worth. Your eyesight may be the limitation at 67x. To see the true resolution of a scope requires enough magnification so that the scope's resolution in arc seconds multiplied by the magnification is comfortably worse than your eyesight acuity. 1.57 x 67 = 105.19 arcsec. 20/20 vision is equal to 120 arcsec. Lots of people are better than that (on a good day my acuity is around 90 arcsec), but magnifying scope resolution to around 150-160 arcsec makes reading the resolution on the chart much easier for me. I would be inclined to use around 150x to test a 100mm scope using the USAF chart. My experience testing many scopes with this chart is that the best ones show resolution of about 115/D, where D is the aperture of the scope in millimeters, so a "perfect" 100mm scope would measure about 1.15 arcsec. Birding scopes have design limitations that usually cause then to be considerably worse than that. The only birding scope I've measured that came close was the best of 3 Kowa 883's at 119/D. I would consider any birding scope better than 130/D to be a cherry sample. Average performance might fall between 130-140D. Anything worse than 135/D would normally not make me very happy, but there are other considerations in this case. Your scope may do better than 157/D once you measure it at higher magnification, but even if it doesn't improve the raw figure of 1.57 arcsec is as good as most specimens of expensive 80mm class birding scopes and at 67x it may present as much or more detail than your eye is capable of seeing anyway. It might be interesting to experiment with some stop down masks. It's probable that the image through this scope will actually look cleaner and sharper when it is stopped down to 80-85mm, with no loss of detail and only a slight loss of brightness. Henry [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Celestron Regal 100 mm Spotting Scope Arrived Today
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top