What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
Celestron Ultima DX 8x32
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankD" data-source="post: 1244152" data-attributes="member: 18544"><p>Alexis,</p><p></p><p>I was hoping you would read this as I know you wanted to hear Bob's and my impressions of the bin. I look forward to seeing Bob's impressions because he can compare his directly with the 8x30 E II and the 8x32 SE. I do not expect it to be in their league but half way between them and the Nikon Action Extremes would be great, especially for the price.</p><p></p><p>I will do my best to compare the Ultima DX to the Yosemite of the same configuration some time in the next week. I loaned the 8x30 Yosemites out to a friend but plan on getting them back shortly. Though not an apples to apples comparison I can compare them to the 6x30 Yosemites from an optical standpoint.</p><p></p><p>To eliminate the obvious, the 6x30 Yosemite is brighter with better depth of field. The apparent field of view is significantlhy wider on the DX and even the true field of view (at 8x) is wider than the 6x30 Yosemite. The view is significantly "flatter" on the Yosemite. Perceived resolution would be a toss-up as both appear equally sharp. A slight edge might go to the Ultima DX. Color representation is just a bit more neutral on the Yosemite.</p><p></p><p>Physically the two are quite different. The DX is obviously heavier with a thicker overall feel. The latter could be a bit of a benefit if you have larger hands as I do. The focusing mechanism on each feels fairly similar with a bit more resistance in the DX's. Probably the most significant difference physically is that the DX feels more like a "tank" in terms of construction. The physical weight gives it some of that feel but the fluidness of the eyecup bridge movement along with the eyecup rotation and the central hinge tension all feel more solid than that of the Yosemite.</p><p></p><p>Hope this somewhat answers your question. I will have more to add when I get the 8x30 Yosemites back in my possession.</p><p></p><p>Flare control is excellent on the Ultima DXs. I have not run into any situations thus far in which the DXs exhibited flare. However, because of the size and shape of the eyecups/eyepieces I do get some annoying reflections from stray light that enters next to my eyes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankD, post: 1244152, member: 18544"] Alexis, I was hoping you would read this as I know you wanted to hear Bob's and my impressions of the bin. I look forward to seeing Bob's impressions because he can compare his directly with the 8x30 E II and the 8x32 SE. I do not expect it to be in their league but half way between them and the Nikon Action Extremes would be great, especially for the price. I will do my best to compare the Ultima DX to the Yosemite of the same configuration some time in the next week. I loaned the 8x30 Yosemites out to a friend but plan on getting them back shortly. Though not an apples to apples comparison I can compare them to the 6x30 Yosemites from an optical standpoint. To eliminate the obvious, the 6x30 Yosemite is brighter with better depth of field. The apparent field of view is significantlhy wider on the DX and even the true field of view (at 8x) is wider than the 6x30 Yosemite. The view is significantly "flatter" on the Yosemite. Perceived resolution would be a toss-up as both appear equally sharp. A slight edge might go to the Ultima DX. Color representation is just a bit more neutral on the Yosemite. Physically the two are quite different. The DX is obviously heavier with a thicker overall feel. The latter could be a bit of a benefit if you have larger hands as I do. The focusing mechanism on each feels fairly similar with a bit more resistance in the DX's. Probably the most significant difference physically is that the DX feels more like a "tank" in terms of construction. The physical weight gives it some of that feel but the fluidness of the eyecup bridge movement along with the eyecup rotation and the central hinge tension all feel more solid than that of the Yosemite. Hope this somewhat answers your question. I will have more to add when I get the 8x30 Yosemites back in my possession. Flare control is excellent on the Ultima DXs. I have not run into any situations thus far in which the DXs exhibited flare. However, because of the size and shape of the eyecups/eyepieces I do get some annoying reflections from stray light that enters next to my eyes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
Celestron Ultima DX 8x32
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top