What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Changes to Gulf of Guinea endemics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xenospiza" data-source="post: 1146359" data-attributes="member: 23772"><p>One of the generally very interesting talks at the African Bird Club meeting yesterday was by Martim Melo and dealt with the birds of São Tomé and Príncipe.</p><p>Not only are they the home to a lot of endemics for such a small place, they also host a number of birds with up till now uncertain relationships. However, much of these have been unravelled, with some huge surprises!</p><p></p><p>(1) The small kingfishers should both be treated as subspecies of <em>Alcedo cristata</em>, <strong>Malachite Kingfisher</strong>, with <em>nais</em> (Príncipe) the most distinct.</p><p>(2) <em>Amaurocichla bocagii</em>, <strong>Bocage’s Longbill</strong> or <strong>São Tomé Short-tail</strong>: this is a pipit! Will have to be renamed to <em>Anthus bocagii</em> (and <strong>São Tomé Pipit</strong>?)</p><p>(3) <em>Horizorhinus dohrni</em>, <strong>Dohrn's Thrush-babbler</strong>: closely related to the hill-babblers (<em>Pseudoalcippe</em>) of the African mountains. The genus may not be retained.</p><p>(4) The genus <em>Speirops</em> (<em>melanocephalus</em>, <strong>Cameroon</strong>, <em>brunneus</em>, <strong>Fernando Po</strong>, <em>leucophoeus</em>, <strong>Príncipe</strong> and <em>lugubris</em>, <strong>Black-capped Speirops</strong>) is polyphyletic and should be lumped with <em>Zosterops</em>.</p><p><em>melanocephalus</em> and <em>brunneus</em> belong to a “mainland clade” related to <em>Z. stenocricotus</em> (split from <em>senegalensis</em>?). The other two are in an “oceanic clade” related to the “normal-looking white-eyes” of São Tomé, Príncipe and Annobón. Moreover, <em>Zosterops feae</em>, <strong>São Tomé White-eye</strong> should be split from Z<em>. ficedulinus</em>, <strong>Príncipe White-eye</strong>. This leaves the latter, which is dependent on primary forest, as a highly threatened taxon (<em>feae</em> is common).</p><p>(5) The three sunbirds are not related to each other, but to three different mainland lineages. The present treatment of sunbirds with many genera is nonsense anyway according to genetics... but there will be no endemic genus left once all has been resolved.</p><p>(6) <em>Turdus olivaceofuscus</em>, <strong>Gulf of Guinea Thrush</strong> should be split into two island endemics, which means the primary forest dwelling <em>T. xanthorhynchus</em>, <strong>Príncipe Thrush</strong> is highly endangered. The form on São Tomé should be called <strong>São Tomé Thrush</strong> of course.</p><p>(7) The weavers should all stay in <em>Ploceus</em>. Genetics have shown that the curious <strong>São Tomé Weaver</strong> (sometimes called <em>Thomasophantes sanctithomae</em>) is related to <em>Anaplectes rubriceps</em>, <strong>Red-headed Weaver</strong>: this genus should be lumped into <em>Ploceus</em>.</p><p>(8) Last, but not least the seedeaters. The enigmatic <em>Neospiza concolor</em>, <strong>São Tomé Grosbeak</strong> (now easier to find since its favourite food plant is known) turned out to be the largest canary in the world (in good company with the largest sunbird, oriole and weaver). It is more closely related to <em>Serinus rufobrunneus thomensis</em>, <strong>“São Tomé Seedeater”</strong> than this “subspecies” is to the nominate <em>Serinus r. rufobrunneus</em>, <strong>Príncipe Seedeater</strong>. Obviously, this requires another split! <em>S. rufobrunneus fradei</em> living on Boné do Jóquei (a rock off Príncipe’s coast) is already genetically distinct (although very moderately), with no evidence of mixing with its neighbours across the water.</p><p>More interesting perhaps is that these relationships seem to indicate that the São Tomé Grosbeak and São Tomé Seedeater evolved sympatrically from a common ancestor (good news for people who study crossbills).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xenospiza, post: 1146359, member: 23772"] One of the generally very interesting talks at the African Bird Club meeting yesterday was by Martim Melo and dealt with the birds of São Tomé and Príncipe. Not only are they the home to a lot of endemics for such a small place, they also host a number of birds with up till now uncertain relationships. However, much of these have been unravelled, with some huge surprises! (1) The small kingfishers should both be treated as subspecies of [I]Alcedo cristata[/I], [B]Malachite Kingfisher[/B], with [I]nais[/I] (Príncipe) the most distinct. (2) [I]Amaurocichla bocagii[/I], [B]Bocage’s Longbill[/B] or [B]São Tomé Short-tail[/B]: this is a pipit! Will have to be renamed to [I]Anthus bocagii[/I] (and [B]São Tomé Pipit[/B]?) (3) [I]Horizorhinus dohrni[/I], [B]Dohrn's Thrush-babbler[/B]: closely related to the hill-babblers ([I]Pseudoalcippe[/I]) of the African mountains. The genus may not be retained. (4) The genus [I]Speirops[/I] ([I]melanocephalus[/I], [B]Cameroon[/B], [I]brunneus[/I], [B]Fernando Po[/B], [I]leucophoeus[/I], [B]Príncipe[/B] and [I]lugubris[/I], [B]Black-capped Speirops[/B]) is polyphyletic and should be lumped with [I]Zosterops[/I]. [I]melanocephalus[/I] and [I]brunneus[/I] belong to a “mainland clade” related to [I]Z. stenocricotus[/I] (split from [I]senegalensis[/I]?). The other two are in an “oceanic clade” related to the “normal-looking white-eyes” of São Tomé, Príncipe and Annobón. Moreover, [I]Zosterops feae[/I], [B]São Tomé White-eye[/B] should be split from Z[I]. ficedulinus[/I], [B]Príncipe White-eye[/B]. This leaves the latter, which is dependent on primary forest, as a highly threatened taxon ([I]feae[/I] is common). (5) The three sunbirds are not related to each other, but to three different mainland lineages. The present treatment of sunbirds with many genera is nonsense anyway according to genetics... but there will be no endemic genus left once all has been resolved. (6) [I]Turdus olivaceofuscus[/I], [B]Gulf of Guinea Thrush[/B] should be split into two island endemics, which means the primary forest dwelling [I]T. xanthorhynchus[/I], [B]Príncipe Thrush[/B] is highly endangered. The form on São Tomé should be called [B]São Tomé Thrush[/B] of course. (7) The weavers should all stay in [I]Ploceus[/I]. Genetics have shown that the curious [B]São Tomé Weaver[/B] (sometimes called [I]Thomasophantes sanctithomae[/I]) is related to [I]Anaplectes rubriceps[/I], [B]Red-headed Weaver[/B]: this genus should be lumped into [I]Ploceus[/I]. (8) Last, but not least the seedeaters. The enigmatic [I]Neospiza concolor[/I], [B]São Tomé Grosbeak[/B] (now easier to find since its favourite food plant is known) turned out to be the largest canary in the world (in good company with the largest sunbird, oriole and weaver). It is more closely related to [I]Serinus rufobrunneus thomensis[/I], [B]“São Tomé Seedeater”[/B] than this “subspecies” is to the nominate [I]Serinus r. rufobrunneus[/I], [B]Príncipe Seedeater[/B]. Obviously, this requires another split! [I]S. rufobrunneus fradei[/I] living on Boné do Jóquei (a rock off Príncipe’s coast) is already genetically distinct (although very moderately), with no evidence of mixing with its neighbours across the water. More interesting perhaps is that these relationships seem to indicate that the São Tomé Grosbeak and São Tomé Seedeater evolved sympatrically from a common ancestor (good news for people who study crossbills). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Changes to Gulf of Guinea endemics
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top