What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Cheaper and compatibility
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Claymore" data-source="post: 1494800" data-attributes="member: 64683"><p>i have a Sigmonster lens (300-800mm) I had the 500mm Canon L but decided i prefered having a zoom as i have mobility problems so sold the Canon. Having used both I honestly cannot spot ANY difference in picture quality apart from the Sigma enables me to get closer.</p><p>my mate is a pro togger and has used both my lenses and actually preferred the Sigma.</p><p>The thing i have noticed over the years regarding quality is usually down to the person taking the shot ie My shots are far from excellent and this is down to me being a crap photographer but give the same gear to someone with more experiance and its amazing the difference in quality. So my £6500 Sigma lens isn't as good as a Canon 500mm? wish i'd know before buying it.</p><p>Think I'll dig my old yashica fxd quartz out (remember them)? ah those were the days just stick a film in and away you go LoL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Claymore, post: 1494800, member: 64683"] i have a Sigmonster lens (300-800mm) I had the 500mm Canon L but decided i prefered having a zoom as i have mobility problems so sold the Canon. Having used both I honestly cannot spot ANY difference in picture quality apart from the Sigma enables me to get closer. my mate is a pro togger and has used both my lenses and actually preferred the Sigma. The thing i have noticed over the years regarding quality is usually down to the person taking the shot ie My shots are far from excellent and this is down to me being a crap photographer but give the same gear to someone with more experiance and its amazing the difference in quality. So my £6500 Sigma lens isn't as good as a Canon 500mm? wish i'd know before buying it. Think I'll dig my old yashica fxd quartz out (remember them)? ah those were the days just stick a film in and away you go LoL [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Cheaper and compatibility
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top