What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lashinala" data-source="post: 1597258" data-attributes="member: 68148"><p>Just some off the wall comments:</p><p>James- I could see a point in the future where some idiot fundy denies that geat apes even ever existed if they went extinct, and few would have the resources to prove it as they are fairly rare.</p><p>Paul- the US has too many tigers already, acccording to some. Elephants are bred here comfortably in large numbers. Pandas would be easy to add in some remote areas and would be a huge draw. Think of North America (or any large area really) as a large Noah's ark and you begin to see the picture. If we raised pandas here, China may ask for some back after a century or 2...after restoring wild areas...we have the resources and the will for now and they don't. Countries mature slowly and get 'stuck on stupid' because money talks, US is a text book example in 1900s...but eventually money moves just like animals do...towards a diversity of labor (just like biodiversity) and lazy people end up in the same place as lazy deer...looking for an easier niche to survive in. Usually poaching is the problem, not hunting. And hunting for bushmeat needs constant regulation, which is expensive. Put the pandas somewhere else? Impefect solution but seems reasonable.</p><p></p><p>Nightranger-in the end, animals have the same right as we do...to struggle for existance. All other rights disappear under some circumstance or another, humans just agree to be civil (usually). We can present our rights all we want in a natural disaster...fire,volcanic eruption,tsunami,hurricane,etc. but the survivor knows when to just get out of the way. Its a human tsunami in China...get the panda out of the way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lashinala, post: 1597258, member: 68148"] Just some off the wall comments: James- I could see a point in the future where some idiot fundy denies that geat apes even ever existed if they went extinct, and few would have the resources to prove it as they are fairly rare. Paul- the US has too many tigers already, acccording to some. Elephants are bred here comfortably in large numbers. Pandas would be easy to add in some remote areas and would be a huge draw. Think of North America (or any large area really) as a large Noah's ark and you begin to see the picture. If we raised pandas here, China may ask for some back after a century or 2...after restoring wild areas...we have the resources and the will for now and they don't. Countries mature slowly and get 'stuck on stupid' because money talks, US is a text book example in 1900s...but eventually money moves just like animals do...towards a diversity of labor (just like biodiversity) and lazy people end up in the same place as lazy deer...looking for an easier niche to survive in. Usually poaching is the problem, not hunting. And hunting for bushmeat needs constant regulation, which is expensive. Put the pandas somewhere else? Impefect solution but seems reasonable. Nightranger-in the end, animals have the same right as we do...to struggle for existance. All other rights disappear under some circumstance or another, humans just agree to be civil (usually). We can present our rights all we want in a natural disaster...fire,volcanic eruption,tsunami,hurricane,etc. but the survivor knows when to just get out of the way. Its a human tsunami in China...get the panda out of the way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top