What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaff" data-source="post: 1600236" data-attributes="member: 42340"><p>I think the main point Chris was making is that vast amounts of resources are being poured into protecting the last surviving Pandas which could otherwise be used elsewhere. Like preserving many more areas of rainforest which are threatened and much more species rich for example. Does a big black and white bear deserve more attenion that hundreds of endangered species in threatened areas of rainforest?</p><p></p><p>And so his point about the 'teddy bear' comment was that as people we tend to care more for animals which have a greater intrinsic value to us and which we can anthropomorphise. Now I dare say many on here may consider themselves above such things but mr & mrs Joe Public are a different matter. "Adopt a Mauritus Kestrel" just doesn't quite seem the same somehow, does it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaff, post: 1600236, member: 42340"] I think the main point Chris was making is that vast amounts of resources are being poured into protecting the last surviving Pandas which could otherwise be used elsewhere. Like preserving many more areas of rainforest which are threatened and much more species rich for example. Does a big black and white bear deserve more attenion that hundreds of endangered species in threatened areas of rainforest? And so his point about the 'teddy bear' comment was that as people we tend to care more for animals which have a greater intrinsic value to us and which we can anthropomorphise. Now I dare say many on here may consider themselves above such things but mr & mrs Joe Public are a different matter. "Adopt a Mauritus Kestrel" just doesn't quite seem the same somehow, does it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top