What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nightranger" data-source="post: 1601756" data-attributes="member: 64473"><p>At the end of the day, this is a very good way of summing up because it would suggest we have learned absolutely nothing nor taken up the warnings. However, I think I may be being overly pessimistic if I was to suggest that is the point we have reached. In many ways, Chris may have sounded an alarm bell over the possibility of complacency or at least, not taking everything for granted. I am a keen fan of what the DWCT do despite failing to get a job there a few years back in circumstances that had a profound effect on my life - the consequence of abandoning species preservation would invalidate at least half of their work along with the WWF and to a lesser extent, the Born Free Foundation. It could be argued that Chris was championing the work of organisations like the RSPB, WWT and Wildlife Trusts but that may be too simplistic because captive breeding for reintroduction is a useful tool that rests alongside species preservation. As has been pointed out, it is not easy to run with comparisons but it is difficult not to see a point where captive breeding links arms with species preservation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nightranger, post: 1601756, member: 64473"] At the end of the day, this is a very good way of summing up because it would suggest we have learned absolutely nothing nor taken up the warnings. However, I think I may be being overly pessimistic if I was to suggest that is the point we have reached. In many ways, Chris may have sounded an alarm bell over the possibility of complacency or at least, not taking everything for granted. I am a keen fan of what the DWCT do despite failing to get a job there a few years back in circumstances that had a profound effect on my life - the consequence of abandoning species preservation would invalidate at least half of their work along with the WWF and to a lesser extent, the Born Free Foundation. It could be argued that Chris was championing the work of organisations like the RSPB, WWT and Wildlife Trusts but that may be too simplistic because captive breeding for reintroduction is a useful tool that rests alongside species preservation. As has been pointed out, it is not easy to run with comparisons but it is difficult not to see a point where captive breeding links arms with species preservation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top