What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mysticete" data-source="post: 1601775" data-attributes="member: 67784"><p>Several thoughts:</p><p></p><p>One, the Giant Panda is in no way a species naturally "on it's way out"; During the early Holocene and Pleistocene it had a quite large range in Asia, extending over much of China as well as Vietnam and other parts of Asia. It's current range is merely a result of human persecution and habitat destruction. The Giant panda is merely one of the few victims of the Pleistocene extinction which was able to get lucky and hold out until today (along with California Condor and Muskox)</p><p></p><p>Two, like it or not, Chris Packham's comments are not at all surprising, and just about all zoologists recognize that we pick our conservation battles. We do not have the time nor resources to restore every endangered species. Much of conservation is holding actions, and as climate change becomes a greater and greater issue, we are going to have to make some tough decisions on what can and can't be saved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mysticete, post: 1601775, member: 67784"] Several thoughts: One, the Giant Panda is in no way a species naturally "on it's way out"; During the early Holocene and Pleistocene it had a quite large range in Asia, extending over much of China as well as Vietnam and other parts of Asia. It's current range is merely a result of human persecution and habitat destruction. The Giant panda is merely one of the few victims of the Pleistocene extinction which was able to get lucky and hold out until today (along with California Condor and Muskox) Two, like it or not, Chris Packham's comments are not at all surprising, and just about all zoologists recognize that we pick our conservation battles. We do not have the time nor resources to restore every endangered species. Much of conservation is holding actions, and as climate change becomes a greater and greater issue, we are going to have to make some tough decisions on what can and can't be saved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top