What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Johnny Allan" data-source="post: 1601933" data-attributes="member: 60985"><p>Whilst I agree that we should not give up on the Giant Panda as it's a recognisable symbol of wildlife conservation, I can understand how Chris Packham could be pessimistic about the situation. The Chinese population continues to grow.</p><p></p><p>People talk endlessly about global warming and climate change when the real threat to the planets wildlife and environment is uncontrolled, unabating and unsustainable population growth. Even if climate change wasn't caused by man, the effects of it will be at least exacerbated by unabating population growth.</p><p></p><p>Every time I see a new wildlife programme, for example the latest one on Papua New Guinea, the programme invariably mentions man's destruction of habitat and wildlife. Papua New Guinea is no different and logging is now taking place, twenty miles from where new animal species are just being found. The recent wildlife programme "South Pacific" ended with large international fishing fleets hoovering up the ocean.</p><p></p><p>I'd be happy if governments, wildlife and other conservation bodies spent one tenth of the time they spend on climate change, realising that uncontrolled, unabating and unsustainable population growth will destroy the world's wildlife and environment. </p><p></p><p>However, I suppose there's not much political mileage in suggesting that we have smaller families whereas they can tax us on carbon emissions etc and pretend to be green. In the meantime, we are documenting the destruction of our wildlife and environment.</p><p></p><p>Johnny Allan</p><p></p><p>ps we're having a similar problem with habitat grabbing at my local birding patch, Beddington Farmlands. What should be wet grassland for a nature reserve, is under a "temporary" re-cycling plant which they are trying to make permanent. Vested interests are trying to grab more Metropolitan Open Land from this designated Metropolitan Site of Importance for Nature Conservation for waste disposal. Bigger population, more waste.</p><p></p><p>If anyone would like to help in our fight against this and to establish a major urban nature reserve, go to:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://beddingtonfarmlands.org.uk/" target="_blank">http://beddingtonfarmlands.org.uk/</a></p><p></p><p>And click on "South London Waste Plan"</p><p></p><p>Many thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Johnny Allan, post: 1601933, member: 60985"] Whilst I agree that we should not give up on the Giant Panda as it's a recognisable symbol of wildlife conservation, I can understand how Chris Packham could be pessimistic about the situation. The Chinese population continues to grow. People talk endlessly about global warming and climate change when the real threat to the planets wildlife and environment is uncontrolled, unabating and unsustainable population growth. Even if climate change wasn't caused by man, the effects of it will be at least exacerbated by unabating population growth. Every time I see a new wildlife programme, for example the latest one on Papua New Guinea, the programme invariably mentions man's destruction of habitat and wildlife. Papua New Guinea is no different and logging is now taking place, twenty miles from where new animal species are just being found. The recent wildlife programme "South Pacific" ended with large international fishing fleets hoovering up the ocean. I'd be happy if governments, wildlife and other conservation bodies spent one tenth of the time they spend on climate change, realising that uncontrolled, unabating and unsustainable population growth will destroy the world's wildlife and environment. However, I suppose there's not much political mileage in suggesting that we have smaller families whereas they can tax us on carbon emissions etc and pretend to be green. In the meantime, we are documenting the destruction of our wildlife and environment. Johnny Allan ps we're having a similar problem with habitat grabbing at my local birding patch, Beddington Farmlands. What should be wet grassland for a nature reserve, is under a "temporary" re-cycling plant which they are trying to make permanent. Vested interests are trying to grab more Metropolitan Open Land from this designated Metropolitan Site of Importance for Nature Conservation for waste disposal. Bigger population, more waste. If anyone would like to help in our fight against this and to establish a major urban nature reserve, go to: [url]http://beddingtonfarmlands.org.uk/[/url] And click on "South London Waste Plan" Many thanks [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Chris Packham's comments
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top