What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
city viewing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3654574" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>Hi etudiant. post 19.</p><p>The pocket scopes are difficult to use if one is not an expert as the metal bits may need bending slightly to get best images.</p><p>Also I think that they are very difficult to make as Horace routinely aspherised everything using actual star tests to refine the optics.</p><p>I addition some of his triplet correctors seem impossible for mere mortals to make.</p><p>I don't know if anyone could actually make a pocket scope like Horace's to his standards.</p><p>They are like jewels. (He actually used gemstones to make world record microscope objectives).</p><p></p><p>Someone made a 5.5 inch Maksutov type scope and it didn't work because the primary was very badly corrected.</p><p>He took it to Horace who made a special triplet corrector so it worked well.</p><p>The corrector got broken and after Horace had passed away nobody could make another. It was replaced by a doublet. It still isn't very good. I bought the scope but I shouldn't really have done so as it is not a good performer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3654574, member: 111403"] Hi etudiant. post 19. The pocket scopes are difficult to use if one is not an expert as the metal bits may need bending slightly to get best images. Also I think that they are very difficult to make as Horace routinely aspherised everything using actual star tests to refine the optics. I addition some of his triplet correctors seem impossible for mere mortals to make. I don't know if anyone could actually make a pocket scope like Horace's to his standards. They are like jewels. (He actually used gemstones to make world record microscope objectives). Someone made a 5.5 inch Maksutov type scope and it didn't work because the primary was very badly corrected. He took it to Horace who made a special triplet corrector so it worked well. The corrector got broken and after Horace had passed away nobody could make another. It was replaced by a doublet. It still isn't very good. I bought the scope but I shouldn't really have done so as it is not a good performer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
city viewing
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top