What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Classic Porro Comparision: Swarovski Habicht 8x30 vs. Nikon 8x30 E2?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rathaus" data-source="post: 3449987" data-attributes="member: 132018"><p>Re acquity and on axis resolving power, My Experience is the opposite from yours. I wonder if you could have one of the few Habicht duds ever made? I'd Send it back...it has a 30yr warranty, and Swarovski are almost obsessed with indulging any customer concern like no other manufacturer of anything. Also, How does your Habicht compare to various other alphas in your tests?</p><p></p><p>I have better than 20/20 natural vision and have spent endless hours doing nothing but devising ruthless tests to compare absolute on axis acuity between Habicht and various alpha binoculars including the Nikon e2. If your eyes and brain are up to it, 5-10 seconds viewing will easily differentiate the superiority of habicht acquity against Nikon e2. I have found The Habicht is virtually unequalled in resolving the most challenging objects such as silk from a worm or ultra fine single spiders thread in shade or mottled light at a distance of thirty to fourty feet. It's easily the most ruthless test I've ever come up with and almost translucent thin thread can remain disturbingly invisible to some of the worlds greatest binoculars.</p><p></p><p>I have also utilised my children who are blessed with young perfect eyesight, and they can differentiate within seconds. This is a great standardising test. </p><p></p><p>Having said all that, the Nikon e2 is easier to just shove up to your face and have an 'instant gratification' easy view. I'd recommend it for most...if I had a family gathering at a scenic location, I wouldn't bother handing them Habichts,,,they'd prefer the initially easier view if the nikons. </p><p></p><p>Also, the 10x in Habicht and 10x Nikon e2 are superb. The 10x 40 Habicht might be better than the 8x Habicht in some ways such as glare control. I also find that the acuity and resolution of the Habicht is so astonishing that it is almost wasted on the 8x, and more fully appreciated and realised at 10x. </p><p></p><p>To conclude with some rationality....If all my bins were confiscated excepting the Nikon e2, I would soon forget my thread and micro bark tests and just enjoy the splendid e2 views on offer which in all honesty is plenty for anybody. IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rathaus, post: 3449987, member: 132018"] Re acquity and on axis resolving power, My Experience is the opposite from yours. I wonder if you could have one of the few Habicht duds ever made? I'd Send it back...it has a 30yr warranty, and Swarovski are almost obsessed with indulging any customer concern like no other manufacturer of anything. Also, How does your Habicht compare to various other alphas in your tests? I have better than 20/20 natural vision and have spent endless hours doing nothing but devising ruthless tests to compare absolute on axis acuity between Habicht and various alpha binoculars including the Nikon e2. If your eyes and brain are up to it, 5-10 seconds viewing will easily differentiate the superiority of habicht acquity against Nikon e2. I have found The Habicht is virtually unequalled in resolving the most challenging objects such as silk from a worm or ultra fine single spiders thread in shade or mottled light at a distance of thirty to fourty feet. It's easily the most ruthless test I've ever come up with and almost translucent thin thread can remain disturbingly invisible to some of the worlds greatest binoculars. I have also utilised my children who are blessed with young perfect eyesight, and they can differentiate within seconds. This is a great standardising test. Having said all that, the Nikon e2 is easier to just shove up to your face and have an 'instant gratification' easy view. I'd recommend it for most...if I had a family gathering at a scenic location, I wouldn't bother handing them Habichts,,,they'd prefer the initially easier view if the nikons. Also, the 10x in Habicht and 10x Nikon e2 are superb. The 10x 40 Habicht might be better than the 8x Habicht in some ways such as glare control. I also find that the acuity and resolution of the Habicht is so astonishing that it is almost wasted on the 8x, and more fully appreciated and realised at 10x. To conclude with some rationality....If all my bins were confiscated excepting the Nikon e2, I would soon forget my thread and micro bark tests and just enjoy the splendid e2 views on offer which in all honesty is plenty for anybody. IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Classic Porro Comparision: Swarovski Habicht 8x30 vs. Nikon 8x30 E2?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top