What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Classic Porro Comparision: Swarovski Habicht 8x30 vs. Nikon 8x30 E2?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rathaus" data-source="post: 3449995" data-attributes="member: 132018"><p>Denco,</p><p></p><p>I edited my post....somewhat clumsily 8-P</p><p></p><p>One of the first mentioned and main concerns was on axis resolution for eyes of 20/15, the viewer noting that Nikon e2 out resolved the Habicht...the viewer noted the Habicht was not sharp. This definitely does not ad up to me. When something obvious (a given) doesn't ad up, something is amiss. Everybody on earth knows about the various Habicht shortcomings...and that's not one of them! Their otherworldly on axis resolution and contrast is what has made them so legendary.</p><p></p><p>If you want to strictly talk flare and glare, viewing in challenging light, then none of the modern swarovisions are great. My 10x Habicht are at least as good in this area. Alpha Canon and Fujinon will destroy any modern Swarovski in this area. I've extensively tested them all side by side. Viewing scenery and wildlife under superb Clear skies, pre, and then post sunset for the next half hour to hour - the swarovisions offer up their typical 'milky and murky' view which renders them almost useless to me at this superb viewing time. Roll out the canon and Fujinon under the same conditions and their capacity to slice through glare is so devastating that I've wondered if their twilight performance isn't better than their daytime performance. I'm talking about an optical difference that a complete layperson can detect and then articulate, unprompted, in a couple of seconds. The not insignificant downside of the canon and Fujinon?...for agile and proper extended use, the user will require the physical size and strength of ex-Soviet weightlifters such as Anatoly Pisarenko or Vasily Alexiev.</p><p></p><p>All bins have their strengths and flaws. It's half the fun <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Rat</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rathaus, post: 3449995, member: 132018"] Denco, I edited my post....somewhat clumsily 8-P One of the first mentioned and main concerns was on axis resolution for eyes of 20/15, the viewer noting that Nikon e2 out resolved the Habicht...the viewer noted the Habicht was not sharp. This definitely does not ad up to me. When something obvious (a given) doesn't ad up, something is amiss. Everybody on earth knows about the various Habicht shortcomings...and that's not one of them! Their otherworldly on axis resolution and contrast is what has made them so legendary. If you want to strictly talk flare and glare, viewing in challenging light, then none of the modern swarovisions are great. My 10x Habicht are at least as good in this area. Alpha Canon and Fujinon will destroy any modern Swarovski in this area. I've extensively tested them all side by side. Viewing scenery and wildlife under superb Clear skies, pre, and then post sunset for the next half hour to hour - the swarovisions offer up their typical 'milky and murky' view which renders them almost useless to me at this superb viewing time. Roll out the canon and Fujinon under the same conditions and their capacity to slice through glare is so devastating that I've wondered if their twilight performance isn't better than their daytime performance. I'm talking about an optical difference that a complete layperson can detect and then articulate, unprompted, in a couple of seconds. The not insignificant downside of the canon and Fujinon?...for agile and proper extended use, the user will require the physical size and strength of ex-Soviet weightlifters such as Anatoly Pisarenko or Vasily Alexiev. All bins have their strengths and flaws. It's half the fun :D Rat [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Classic Porro Comparision: Swarovski Habicht 8x30 vs. Nikon 8x30 E2?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top