What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Coalition of the ignorant
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="etudiant" data-source="post: 3319286" data-attributes="member: 48052"><p>The decision that GMO products do not need to be labeled as such is the central issue here.</p><p>The regulators in the US have stated that the GMO salmon product is functionally equivalent to the conventional salmons, so that labeling is not required.</p><p>Imho, this decision opens the floodgates, which is why I'm opposed to it. </p><p>There is much more change in the pipeline and it desperately needs careful scrutiny.</p><p>GMO applications are skyrocketing, as the process becomes better understood and as the tools for manipulation are improving rapidly.</p><p>Yet the regulators are basically throwing up their hands with this decision and leaving the polity to deal with the consequences, even though those are not yet understood.</p><p>We have a pretty clean environment genetically as yet. This decision puts that at risk. It needs to get reversed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="etudiant, post: 3319286, member: 48052"] The decision that GMO products do not need to be labeled as such is the central issue here. The regulators in the US have stated that the GMO salmon product is functionally equivalent to the conventional salmons, so that labeling is not required. Imho, this decision opens the floodgates, which is why I'm opposed to it. There is much more change in the pipeline and it desperately needs careful scrutiny. GMO applications are skyrocketing, as the process becomes better understood and as the tools for manipulation are improving rapidly. Yet the regulators are basically throwing up their hands with this decision and leaving the polity to deal with the consequences, even though those are not yet understood. We have a pretty clean environment genetically as yet. This decision puts that at risk. It needs to get reversed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Coalition of the ignorant
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top