What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Coatings questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ronh" data-source="post: 1224252" data-attributes="member: 55514"><p>John, thanks for your impressions of these models. It sounds like I'm not missing much optically. Although the Trinovid is a bit of a brick, did anybody ever complain that a brick was poorly balanced?</p><p></p><p>Henry, thanks for that perspective, and for the interesting bit about blue light. The optics purist of course simply wants all the light, perfectly focussed, and artifact free. The thing is, I thought that was me! Maybe it isn't.</p><p></p><p>Ron, this is wonderful, my science-based side is reeling with delight. So, Trinovid's bandpass is flatter, and most of the Ultravid's gain is in the orange and red. It seems like in the reddish light of sunrise and sunset, the Ultravid would make better use of the light, but by the white light of midday, the Trinovid would appear more color correct. I suppose perceived contrast would depend on which bino, the ambient light color, and color differences in the scene, but given a wide range of conditions and scene colorations, Trinovid, although dimmer, might just have the contrast edge.</p><p></p><p>It strikes me that Leica is not only alone in their willingness to share such information with you, but there are several examples of Leica sales literature being oddly consistent with what is known otherwise to be true. The current very slick website, for example, says that it is relatively easy to modify coatings to achieve better transmission in the blue, but that in the the Ultravid they have avoided this because it would have given an unpleasant view. They also state that no lubricant is used on the focusing mechanism, an issue long a source of pride or annoyance to the Leica crowd, and a fact that, coupled with the change to less-than-slick-surfaced Titanium for the focusing axle, may explain the frequent complaints about the Ultravid's focus feel, which many feel is worse even than the Trinovid's. Could it possibly be that they are honest and forthright, with nothing to hide? </p><p>Ron</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ronh, post: 1224252, member: 55514"] John, thanks for your impressions of these models. It sounds like I'm not missing much optically. Although the Trinovid is a bit of a brick, did anybody ever complain that a brick was poorly balanced? Henry, thanks for that perspective, and for the interesting bit about blue light. The optics purist of course simply wants all the light, perfectly focussed, and artifact free. The thing is, I thought that was me! Maybe it isn't. Ron, this is wonderful, my science-based side is reeling with delight. So, Trinovid's bandpass is flatter, and most of the Ultravid's gain is in the orange and red. It seems like in the reddish light of sunrise and sunset, the Ultravid would make better use of the light, but by the white light of midday, the Trinovid would appear more color correct. I suppose perceived contrast would depend on which bino, the ambient light color, and color differences in the scene, but given a wide range of conditions and scene colorations, Trinovid, although dimmer, might just have the contrast edge. It strikes me that Leica is not only alone in their willingness to share such information with you, but there are several examples of Leica sales literature being oddly consistent with what is known otherwise to be true. The current very slick website, for example, says that it is relatively easy to modify coatings to achieve better transmission in the blue, but that in the the Ultravid they have avoided this because it would have given an unpleasant view. They also state that no lubricant is used on the focusing mechanism, an issue long a source of pride or annoyance to the Leica crowd, and a fact that, coupled with the change to less-than-slick-surfaced Titanium for the focusing axle, may explain the frequent complaints about the Ultravid's focus feel, which many feel is worse even than the Trinovid's. Could it possibly be that they are honest and forthright, with nothing to hide? Ron [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Coatings questions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top