What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Colour balance - is it really that important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Russell" data-source="post: 1607810" data-attributes="member: 22179"><p>OK, a colour bias means that there is higher absorbtion somewhere in the spectrum and that is undesirable but I cannot understand the nitpicking about minor colour deviations in bins and scopes and hold the assertion that they could affect an identification for wildly exaggerated.</p><p>I have one of the older Zeiss Diascopes with a rather pronounced yellow tint but I never really noticed it until I put the Diascope up side by side with a new Leica Apo-Televid 82.</p><p>Great White Egrets, Spoonbills and Swans all appear white in the Diascope. There is no direct comparison with reality. Otherwise we wouldn't need the bins or scope.</p><p>Colour rendition in field guides BTW can only be an approximation. </p><p>Colour temperature varies according to the time of day and meteorological conditions but the eyes and brain adapt and even under tungsten or neon light (whose spectral analysis is a series of spikes) we perceive white paper as being white.</p><p>Maybe there are disadvantages in using military bins with laser filters but isn't the rest all hype?</p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Russell, post: 1607810, member: 22179"] OK, a colour bias means that there is higher absorbtion somewhere in the spectrum and that is undesirable but I cannot understand the nitpicking about minor colour deviations in bins and scopes and hold the assertion that they could affect an identification for wildly exaggerated. I have one of the older Zeiss Diascopes with a rather pronounced yellow tint but I never really noticed it until I put the Diascope up side by side with a new Leica Apo-Televid 82. Great White Egrets, Spoonbills and Swans all appear white in the Diascope. There is no direct comparison with reality. Otherwise we wouldn't need the bins or scope. Colour rendition in field guides BTW can only be an approximation. Colour temperature varies according to the time of day and meteorological conditions but the eyes and brain adapt and even under tungsten or neon light (whose spectral analysis is a series of spikes) we perceive white paper as being white. Maybe there are disadvantages in using military bins with laser filters but isn't the rest all hype? John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Colour balance - is it really that important?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top