What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Colour balance - is it really that important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kammerdiner" data-source="post: 1616525" data-attributes="member: 75300"><p>I'm actually using the terms "cool" and "warm" the same way artists, interior decorators, and even light bulb manufacturers use them. A "cool white" lightbulb, for instance, is actually bluer than a "soft white" bulb. For a long time, fluorescent lighting got a bad rap for being a "cold" light when compared to a "warm" incandescent light. Nowadays, many fluorescents have been warmed up. "Arctic white" is a cooler color than "Eggshell white." Scarlet red (as in the scarlet tanager) is warmer than cardinal red (as in the northern cardinal). Emerald green is warmer than forest green, etc.</p><p></p><p>It's true that measured in degrees Kelvin, blue light is "hotter" than red (there's no actual "temperature" involved, by the way. It's just a convention), but in terms of perception, "warmer" colors have more red in them and "cooler" colors have more blue in them.</p><p></p><p>I'm reminded of the saying "looking at the world through rose-colored glasses." The idea is that you're looking at a "cold" world artificially "warmed up" by tinted glasses.</p><p></p><p>And this is where the discussion of warm and cold binoculars comes in. Imagine two ideal bins, completely neutral in terms of color. Then imagine adding a very slight red reflective coating to one, and a very slight blue reflective coating to the other. The blue coating would "warm up" the color, because the cooler hues are reflected while the warmer hues are transmitted, and the red coating would "cool down" the color for analogous reasons.</p><p></p><p>Not surprisingly, the Zeiss FL bins reflect a kind of reddish/magenta at both ends and overall the FL tends to be perceived as cool.</p><p></p><p>The Nikon SE I have (and I think Nikons in general) tend to reflect blue-green at both ends and are perceived as warmer.</p><p></p><p>I haven't scrutinized my Leica, but my guess is I might see a mix of reflections that render them quite neutral overall. The fact that I can't even recall a particular tint one way or the other suggests they may be neutral.</p><p></p><p>There is, I am sure, a lot more to it than I've suggested. But I think this explains things in a general, layman's way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kammerdiner, post: 1616525, member: 75300"] I'm actually using the terms "cool" and "warm" the same way artists, interior decorators, and even light bulb manufacturers use them. A "cool white" lightbulb, for instance, is actually bluer than a "soft white" bulb. For a long time, fluorescent lighting got a bad rap for being a "cold" light when compared to a "warm" incandescent light. Nowadays, many fluorescents have been warmed up. "Arctic white" is a cooler color than "Eggshell white." Scarlet red (as in the scarlet tanager) is warmer than cardinal red (as in the northern cardinal). Emerald green is warmer than forest green, etc. It's true that measured in degrees Kelvin, blue light is "hotter" than red (there's no actual "temperature" involved, by the way. It's just a convention), but in terms of perception, "warmer" colors have more red in them and "cooler" colors have more blue in them. I'm reminded of the saying "looking at the world through rose-colored glasses." The idea is that you're looking at a "cold" world artificially "warmed up" by tinted glasses. And this is where the discussion of warm and cold binoculars comes in. Imagine two ideal bins, completely neutral in terms of color. Then imagine adding a very slight red reflective coating to one, and a very slight blue reflective coating to the other. The blue coating would "warm up" the color, because the cooler hues are reflected while the warmer hues are transmitted, and the red coating would "cool down" the color for analogous reasons. Not surprisingly, the Zeiss FL bins reflect a kind of reddish/magenta at both ends and overall the FL tends to be perceived as cool. The Nikon SE I have (and I think Nikons in general) tend to reflect blue-green at both ends and are perceived as warmer. I haven't scrutinized my Leica, but my guess is I might see a mix of reflections that render them quite neutral overall. The fact that I can't even recall a particular tint one way or the other suggests they may be neutral. There is, I am sure, a lot more to it than I've suggested. But I think this explains things in a general, layman's way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Colour balance - is it really that important?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top