What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Colour balance - is it really that important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 1616782" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>The light transmission graphic (below right) for the Nikon HG-L (LX-L) is from the Nikon Japan website. Compare it to the lower right square in the photo on the left. That's the photographic appearance of the color bias of the same binocular from post #25 in Photo Method thread I linked to. In the Nikon graphic the light transmission shows a broad peak centered around 640nm (orange/red). The photo shows an orange tint which is exactly what you would expect from the Nikon transmission curve. The optics act as an mild orange filter with a gentle slope that reduces transmission in the blue (470nm) by about 8% compared to transmission at 640nm.</p><p></p><p>As an artist I can attest to the traditional use of "warm" and "cool" for the colors of the painter's palette. This has nothing to do with actual color temperature. It comes from the human emotional response to color which associates greens and blues with cool, shade, and darkness and yellows, oranges and reds with bright sunlight, flame and heat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 1616782, member: 6806"] The light transmission graphic (below right) for the Nikon HG-L (LX-L) is from the Nikon Japan website. Compare it to the lower right square in the photo on the left. That's the photographic appearance of the color bias of the same binocular from post #25 in Photo Method thread I linked to. In the Nikon graphic the light transmission shows a broad peak centered around 640nm (orange/red). The photo shows an orange tint which is exactly what you would expect from the Nikon transmission curve. The optics act as an mild orange filter with a gentle slope that reduces transmission in the blue (470nm) by about 8% compared to transmission at 640nm. As an artist I can attest to the traditional use of "warm" and "cool" for the colors of the painter's palette. This has nothing to do with actual color temperature. It comes from the human emotional response to color which associates greens and blues with cool, shade, and darkness and yellows, oranges and reds with bright sunlight, flame and heat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Colour balance - is it really that important?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top