What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Comments on this lens please
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaff" data-source="post: 1492460" data-attributes="member: 42340"><p>Sorry Richard, it wasn't a personal jibe against you. My apologies. I was more referring to what you so beautifully described as the 'mud-slinging'. :-O</p><p></p><p>In truth, yes, if you had read through the Canon threads you'd have found a wealth of answers to what the 400mm prime can produce as well as the other lenses mentioned and avoided all this. Perhaps a sticky thread at the top reminding people to try searching for the info they seek before starting a new thread would be an idea.</p><p></p><p>I'm just tired of the 'which lens is the best' saga, bottom line is whatever telephoto lens you get, so long as it's an L-grade, will produce results that will blow you away. The one point that I read which I think you should take notice of is that the 100-400mm does seem to attract dust. There's all kinds already on the inside of my outermost piece of glass but nothing internally (at least as far as I can tell!) but it hasn't affected the IQ in the slightest.</p><p></p><p>Happy hunting anyway. :t:</p><p>Adam</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaff, post: 1492460, member: 42340"] Sorry Richard, it wasn't a personal jibe against you. My apologies. I was more referring to what you so beautifully described as the 'mud-slinging'. :-O In truth, yes, if you had read through the Canon threads you'd have found a wealth of answers to what the 400mm prime can produce as well as the other lenses mentioned and avoided all this. Perhaps a sticky thread at the top reminding people to try searching for the info they seek before starting a new thread would be an idea. I'm just tired of the 'which lens is the best' saga, bottom line is whatever telephoto lens you get, so long as it's an L-grade, will produce results that will blow you away. The one point that I read which I think you should take notice of is that the 100-400mm does seem to attract dust. There's all kinds already on the inside of my outermost piece of glass but nothing internally (at least as far as I can tell!) but it hasn't affected the IQ in the slightest. Happy hunting anyway. :t: Adam [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Comments on this lens please
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top