What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Comparison: Leupold Yosemite 6x30 and Celestron Cypress 7x30
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 3212619" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>My experiences are with the original and current Yosemite 8x30, the Eagle optics 8.5x32 clone of the current Yosemite, the old Celestron 8x30 (really 7x30) Nature and the Barska 8x30 (really 7x30) Crossover. </p><p></p><p>IMO the original Yosemite was the best made of the lot and was clearly a different binocular from the current one. The Eagle optics clone appears to be essentially the same binocular from the same factory as the current Yosemite. The Barska and Celestrons, while designed to look similar to the current Yosemite, are different enough in their details to indicate a different maker. I wouldn't expect QC to be great in any of these, but I think there is a lower risk of the kinds of defects, like wobbly eyepiece bridges or poor collimation, that render a binocular unusable in the slightly more expensive Yosemite clones. All three of the Barska/Celestrons I tried were defective to the point of being useless. I just couldn't recommend them to anyone looking for an entry level binocular after that experience.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 3212619, member: 6806"] My experiences are with the original and current Yosemite 8x30, the Eagle optics 8.5x32 clone of the current Yosemite, the old Celestron 8x30 (really 7x30) Nature and the Barska 8x30 (really 7x30) Crossover. IMO the original Yosemite was the best made of the lot and was clearly a different binocular from the current one. The Eagle optics clone appears to be essentially the same binocular from the same factory as the current Yosemite. The Barska and Celestrons, while designed to look similar to the current Yosemite, are different enough in their details to indicate a different maker. I wouldn't expect QC to be great in any of these, but I think there is a lower risk of the kinds of defects, like wobbly eyepiece bridges or poor collimation, that render a binocular unusable in the slightly more expensive Yosemite clones. All three of the Barska/Celestrons I tried were defective to the point of being useless. I just couldn't recommend them to anyone looking for an entry level binocular after that experience. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Comparison: Leupold Yosemite 6x30 and Celestron Cypress 7x30
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top