What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Comparison of 8x32 Victory and 8x30 Conquest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lou H" data-source="post: 692979" data-attributes="member: 46640"><p><strong>Victory, Ultravid, Swaro 8x32s</strong></p><p></p><p>To add to my previous comments on the Zeiss 8x32 T*FL: I had an opportunity to briefly compare the FL to a Swarovski EL8x32 WB and Leica 8x32 Ultravid. It was not an extensive comparison and all viewing was done hand-held. I’m not that fussy about way binos feel in the hand but found I preferred the Leica to the Zeiss to the Swarovski. The Leica was the most compact and I also felt it looked the best. It had smaller diameter eyecups that fit me better than the large diameter Zeiss pieces. The Swarovski has unusual appearance, which could possibly grow on me, but it was a full inch longer than the other two. Although the Zeiss was somewhat bulkier than the Leica, it was not significantly bigger overall. It did look kind of clunky compared to the other two, especially with its huge focus knob. </p><p></p><p>Of course I spent most of my time looking through rather than at these binoculars examining a resolution chart and some detailed colorful items. They all had adequate eye relief to use with my glasses, although I did most viewing with no glasses. No need to say that all three provided excellent viewing with indistinguishably excellent on axis resolution. Switching fairly quickly between the three, I found the Zeiss to be a bit brighter, a smidgeon cooler, and to have a seemingly a wider in fov, although it and the Swaro have the same 420’ fov spec while the Leica is spec-ed at 404’. Looking again more carefully, it seemed the impression of a wider fov was due to the brighter image and less off-axis aberration. Among the three, I felt the view through the Zeiss was the most gratifying with the Swaro and Leica being almost indistinguishable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lou H, post: 692979, member: 46640"] [b]Victory, Ultravid, Swaro 8x32s[/b] To add to my previous comments on the Zeiss 8x32 T*FL: I had an opportunity to briefly compare the FL to a Swarovski EL8x32 WB and Leica 8x32 Ultravid. It was not an extensive comparison and all viewing was done hand-held. I’m not that fussy about way binos feel in the hand but found I preferred the Leica to the Zeiss to the Swarovski. The Leica was the most compact and I also felt it looked the best. It had smaller diameter eyecups that fit me better than the large diameter Zeiss pieces. The Swarovski has unusual appearance, which could possibly grow on me, but it was a full inch longer than the other two. Although the Zeiss was somewhat bulkier than the Leica, it was not significantly bigger overall. It did look kind of clunky compared to the other two, especially with its huge focus knob. Of course I spent most of my time looking through rather than at these binoculars examining a resolution chart and some detailed colorful items. They all had adequate eye relief to use with my glasses, although I did most viewing with no glasses. No need to say that all three provided excellent viewing with indistinguishably excellent on axis resolution. Switching fairly quickly between the three, I found the Zeiss to be a bit brighter, a smidgeon cooler, and to have a seemingly a wider in fov, although it and the Swaro have the same 420’ fov spec while the Leica is spec-ed at 404’. Looking again more carefully, it seemed the impression of a wider fov was due to the brighter image and less off-axis aberration. Among the three, I felt the view through the Zeiss was the most gratifying with the Swaro and Leica being almost indistinguishable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Comparison of 8x32 Victory and 8x30 Conquest
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top