What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Comparison of teleconverters & barlows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul Corfield" data-source="post: 1846418" data-attributes="member: 19132"><p>When I re-did the money photos I noted that my small Antares Apo barlow and my 2" GSO barlow were a bit soft in the corners and I wondered if this was because I have them mounted very close to the camera. I moved them further away from the camera to the sort of position they would be if used with an eyepiece and that produced sharp photos in the corners. I had them mounted flush to the camera body but for these images I put a 40mm macro tube between them and the camera and this is roughly where they would be if screwed into the front of the MAX DSLR or T-ring/scope adapter.</p><p></p><p>Here's 100% crops of the bottom right hand corner of the photo and information written on each image. Range for all of them was about 7m (23 feet)</p><p></p><p>I think for the money the Kenko 1.4X is excellent. The 2" Antares 1.6X (2.3X on scope) is also pretty sharp to the corner. The other two are good value for the price, the Antares Apo is perfectly corrected for CA in the middle of the image but a little creeps in at the corners and the other three are possibly better in this respect.</p><p></p><p>Paul.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul Corfield, post: 1846418, member: 19132"] When I re-did the money photos I noted that my small Antares Apo barlow and my 2" GSO barlow were a bit soft in the corners and I wondered if this was because I have them mounted very close to the camera. I moved them further away from the camera to the sort of position they would be if used with an eyepiece and that produced sharp photos in the corners. I had them mounted flush to the camera body but for these images I put a 40mm macro tube between them and the camera and this is roughly where they would be if screwed into the front of the MAX DSLR or T-ring/scope adapter. Here's 100% crops of the bottom right hand corner of the photo and information written on each image. Range for all of them was about 7m (23 feet) I think for the money the Kenko 1.4X is excellent. The 2" Antares 1.6X (2.3X on scope) is also pretty sharp to the corner. The other two are good value for the price, the Antares Apo is perfectly corrected for CA in the middle of the image but a little creeps in at the corners and the other three are possibly better in this respect. Paul. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Comparison of teleconverters & barlows
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top