What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Comparison of teleconverters & barlows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul Corfield" data-source="post: 1850837" data-attributes="member: 19132"><p>I remember when Yvan did that Powermate test but unfortunately I think he returned it before we could get to the root of the problem.</p><p></p><p>Powermates in the 2X and 2.5X varieties produce a very parallel light path so you gain very little in magnification by moving it further from the camera. Actually the 2.5X version produces less magnification by moving it further away. There's a good diagram on this link showing how distance affects the Powermate magnification. They also do a Powermate T-ring adapter which makes for a compact set up. There's a photo on this link. <a href="http://www.televue.com/engine/page.asp?id=42" target="_blank">http://www.televue.com/engine/page.asp?id=42 </a></p><p></p><p>Pretty sure that with moving barlows further from the camera you are just getting a cropping effect, just like putting a full frame lens on a small sensor dslr. Moving the barlow produces a bigger image circle which falls well outside the size of the sensor. </p><p></p><p>I'll do the test later today.</p><p></p><p>Paul.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul Corfield, post: 1850837, member: 19132"] I remember when Yvan did that Powermate test but unfortunately I think he returned it before we could get to the root of the problem. Powermates in the 2X and 2.5X varieties produce a very parallel light path so you gain very little in magnification by moving it further from the camera. Actually the 2.5X version produces less magnification by moving it further away. There's a good diagram on this link showing how distance affects the Powermate magnification. They also do a Powermate T-ring adapter which makes for a compact set up. There's a photo on this link. [URL="http://www.televue.com/engine/page.asp?id=42"]http://www.televue.com/engine/page.asp?id=42 [/URL] Pretty sure that with moving barlows further from the camera you are just getting a cropping effect, just like putting a full frame lens on a small sensor dslr. Moving the barlow produces a bigger image circle which falls well outside the size of the sensor. I'll do the test later today. Paul. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Photography using 'Astro' telescopes
Comparison of teleconverters & barlows
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top