What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Conservation in the Trumpocene
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="litebeam" data-source="post: 3548534" data-attributes="member: 96459"><p>That may be true with some, but not all John. People on 'the right' have kids that deal with asthma and other issues and they are acutely aware of what is necessary with a clean, wholesome environment. It directly affects their lives.</p><p>Detroit has long been a leftist stronghold, but the city is essentially a poisoned cesspool. </p><p>This is about balance...the careful use, but not abuse of our resources. </p><p>If a coal plant is spewing filth it should be shut down. If it is properly equipped with modern scrubbers to allow use without excessive pollution, use it but monitor it.</p><p>If a mine is poisoning creeks or watersheds, by all means close it! And levy heavy fines. These were areas the EPA had merit, but when they started harassing people because they wanted to develop their property and the EPA forbade it due to some man-made puddle they deemed 'wetlands,' the situation clearly got out of control. This actually happened here in Idaho. The couple was being fined $50K a day whilst they worked near the watershed. The same story can be related for many other places.</p><p>An agency run amok...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="litebeam, post: 3548534, member: 96459"] That may be true with some, but not all John. People on 'the right' have kids that deal with asthma and other issues and they are acutely aware of what is necessary with a clean, wholesome environment. It directly affects their lives. Detroit has long been a leftist stronghold, but the city is essentially a poisoned cesspool. This is about balance...the careful use, but not abuse of our resources. If a coal plant is spewing filth it should be shut down. If it is properly equipped with modern scrubbers to allow use without excessive pollution, use it but monitor it. If a mine is poisoning creeks or watersheds, by all means close it! And levy heavy fines. These were areas the EPA had merit, but when they started harassing people because they wanted to develop their property and the EPA forbade it due to some man-made puddle they deemed 'wetlands,' the situation clearly got out of control. This actually happened here in Idaho. The couple was being fined $50K a day whilst they worked near the watershed. The same story can be related for many other places. An agency run amok... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Conservation in the Trumpocene
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top