What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Consumer Reports Binocular review in Jan 2007 issue
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tvc15_2000" data-source="post: 746739" data-attributes="member: 4960"><p>January 07 issue of Consumer Reports ranked binoculars that cost under $1000.</p><p></p><p>The article explained they tested for sharpness, brightness, flare, how well they focused, portability, grip, ease of adjustment, durability at temps of +13F and +185F for several hours each. The article is 2/3 of a page long, and short on details. It is not an in depth report.</p><p></p><p>The test result bubble columns include image, Durability Ease of use, Field with glasses. </p><p></p><p>I did not have the time to show all ratings but I think most of us would be interested in the image rating which I did include. </p><p></p><p>I do not agree with their findings but am posting them for those who may not have access to the article. I apologize in advance for any unintentional errors I might have made while summarizing. </p><p></p><p>For 10 Power the overall rating scores and the image bubble ratings are as follows:</p><p> Nikon Premier 10X25 90% Image Excellent</p><p> Zeiss Victory Compact 10X25 89% Image Very Good</p><p> Pentax DCF HR II 10X42 81% Image Very Good</p><p> Swarovski 10X25 BP 81% Image Very Good</p><p> Leica Ultravid 10X25 BR 78% Image Very Good</p><p> Audobon 10X42 HP 74% Image Good</p><p> Olympus 10x42 EXWP 71% Image Good</p><p> Pentax UFC-X II 10x25 69% Image Good</p><p></p><p>For 8 Power the overall rating scores are as follows:</p><p> Zeiss 8X20 BT 89% Image Very Good</p><p> Cannon 8X25 87 % Image Very Good</p><p> Zeiss 8X30 Conquest 87% Image Excellent</p><p> Olympus 8X21 RC 1 84% Image Very Good</p><p> Eschenbach Trophy 8X32 78% Image Very Good</p><p> Nikon SportStar 74% Image Good</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tvc15_2000, post: 746739, member: 4960"] January 07 issue of Consumer Reports ranked binoculars that cost under $1000. The article explained they tested for sharpness, brightness, flare, how well they focused, portability, grip, ease of adjustment, durability at temps of +13F and +185F for several hours each. The article is 2/3 of a page long, and short on details. It is not an in depth report. The test result bubble columns include image, Durability Ease of use, Field with glasses. I did not have the time to show all ratings but I think most of us would be interested in the image rating which I did include. I do not agree with their findings but am posting them for those who may not have access to the article. I apologize in advance for any unintentional errors I might have made while summarizing. For 10 Power the overall rating scores and the image bubble ratings are as follows: Nikon Premier 10X25 90% Image Excellent Zeiss Victory Compact 10X25 89% Image Very Good Pentax DCF HR II 10X42 81% Image Very Good Swarovski 10X25 BP 81% Image Very Good Leica Ultravid 10X25 BR 78% Image Very Good Audobon 10X42 HP 74% Image Good Olympus 10x42 EXWP 71% Image Good Pentax UFC-X II 10x25 69% Image Good For 8 Power the overall rating scores are as follows: Zeiss 8X20 BT 89% Image Very Good Cannon 8X25 87 % Image Very Good Zeiss 8X30 Conquest 87% Image Excellent Olympus 8X21 RC 1 84% Image Very Good Eschenbach Trophy 8X32 78% Image Very Good Nikon SportStar 74% Image Good [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Consumer Reports Binocular review in Jan 2007 issue
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top