What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Cosmetic Issues
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 3243547" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>Troubie,</p><p></p><p>Well, you're not helping his case with that photo! </p><p></p><p>True, analog cameras can create reflections and such, but digital cameras, particularly the point & shoot variety that I have (Coolpix) can really make some weird stuff happen. For example, digital zooms are crap. I was trying to take a photo of a squirrel in the backyard that I fed a peanut because it looked like it had something sticking out of its head, I suspect a bot fly nest, but the digital zoom under rather dismal conditions didn't do it much justice. Boosting the light control only made more "noise." </p><p></p><p>If I had my old Canon SLR analog camera with 100 ISO film, I could have increased the exposure or opened up the aperture and gotten more detail. Perhaps expensive higher pixel DSLRs with optical zooms can perform similarly, but not my Coolpix. For $99 + $39 for the memory card, it performs adequately in normal light, but under less than ideal conditions, the autofocus doesn't work, the digital zoom makes the image fuzzy, and the resulting pixelation shows artifacts that aren't there (or that only exist in a parallel world inhabited by pixies). </p><p></p><p><B></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 3243547, member: 665"] Troubie, Well, you're not helping his case with that photo! True, analog cameras can create reflections and such, but digital cameras, particularly the point & shoot variety that I have (Coolpix) can really make some weird stuff happen. For example, digital zooms are crap. I was trying to take a photo of a squirrel in the backyard that I fed a peanut because it looked like it had something sticking out of its head, I suspect a bot fly nest, but the digital zoom under rather dismal conditions didn't do it much justice. Boosting the light control only made more "noise." If I had my old Canon SLR analog camera with 100 ISO film, I could have increased the exposure or opened up the aperture and gotten more detail. Perhaps expensive higher pixel DSLRs with optical zooms can perform similarly, but not my Coolpix. For $99 + $39 for the memory card, it performs adequately in normal light, but under less than ideal conditions, the autofocus doesn't work, the digital zoom makes the image fuzzy, and the resulting pixelation shows artifacts that aren't there (or that only exist in a parallel world inhabited by pixies). <B> [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Cosmetic Issues
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top