What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Counting introduced species
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alexjh1" data-source="post: 3407290" data-attributes="member: 85555"><p>For me, it boils down to a matter of personal preference as much as anything else, obviously if you feel like it doesn't count then don't count it but I tend to take a slightly more philosophical view - that if a species is (or was) established here outside it's natural range, for better or worse it is part of the ecosystem now, and thus part of the fauna of the UK - as such, controversial as this may sound, in some ways I actually regard them as more important ticks than a vagrant.</p><p></p><p>Realistically, there is a not insubstantial chunk of my world list that I've seen only as "pure" introduced/feral populations - Ruddy Duck, Mandarin, Egyptian Goose, Canada Goose, Barnacle Goose, Greylag Goose, Common Pheasant, Lady Amherst's Pheasant, Monk Parakeet, Ring Necked Parakeet, Common Waxbill, Rock Dove, Red Kite and Osprey would be off my list, despite the fact that arguably, they are far "wilder" than for instance my tick of Red-crowned cranes at a feeding station.</p><p></p><p>In general... I'd probably go with a compromise of ticking them but be aware you are doing so?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alexjh1, post: 3407290, member: 85555"] For me, it boils down to a matter of personal preference as much as anything else, obviously if you feel like it doesn't count then don't count it but I tend to take a slightly more philosophical view - that if a species is (or was) established here outside it's natural range, for better or worse it is part of the ecosystem now, and thus part of the fauna of the UK - as such, controversial as this may sound, in some ways I actually regard them as more important ticks than a vagrant. Realistically, there is a not insubstantial chunk of my world list that I've seen only as "pure" introduced/feral populations - Ruddy Duck, Mandarin, Egyptian Goose, Canada Goose, Barnacle Goose, Greylag Goose, Common Pheasant, Lady Amherst's Pheasant, Monk Parakeet, Ring Necked Parakeet, Common Waxbill, Rock Dove, Red Kite and Osprey would be off my list, despite the fact that arguably, they are far "wilder" than for instance my tick of Red-crowned cranes at a feeding station. In general... I'd probably go with a compromise of ticking them but be aware you are doing so? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Counting introduced species
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top