What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Photo Critique
Critique needed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaff" data-source="post: 1650112" data-attributes="member: 42340"><p>Coming in a bit late on this but I have two things I'd like to add. Don't think it's been said but in the first image the one thing that struck me straight away as a distraction from the bird was the flaky piece of post on the right, I'd have cloned that out.</p><p>The other thing, obviously shooting at f4 with the 1.4x would have improved the look of the BG.</p><p></p><p>And my final thought (Jerry Springer style!) is that the images we take are always a very personal thing, there is never a right or wrong way to do things really. Roy said he doesn't like the green post but as I said in the gallery I do like all the green because it's something different. A brown post would have made it less of an image for me, personal preference.</p><p></p><p>So when do we get another one, this is fun! :t: <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaff, post: 1650112, member: 42340"] Coming in a bit late on this but I have two things I'd like to add. Don't think it's been said but in the first image the one thing that struck me straight away as a distraction from the bird was the flaky piece of post on the right, I'd have cloned that out. The other thing, obviously shooting at f4 with the 1.4x would have improved the look of the BG. And my final thought (Jerry Springer style!) is that the images we take are always a very personal thing, there is never a right or wrong way to do things really. Roy said he doesn't like the green post but as I said in the gallery I do like all the green because it's something different. A brown post would have made it less of an image for me, personal preference. So when do we get another one, this is fun! :t: ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Photo Critique
Critique needed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top