What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Photo Critique
Critique needed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="psilo" data-source="post: 1650484" data-attributes="member: 5984"><p>LOL Roy excellent thread though I doubt that your b etter photographs are the result of a fluke. Noone can get consistently good shots and not understand a good level of photography.</p><p></p><p>I think that the only way anyone can learn how to take better photographs is to learn how to effectively critique their own work. I think alot of people take them with little thought or maybe just seem to resign themselves to the fact that they will never really improve but just enjoy doing it anyway. I do not think this is a positive way of thinking. We should all be critical and be able to evaluate what we produce. Photography is never static. Nobody ever learns everything but it is the challenge of trying and learning new things that keeps you interested. As you have shown with this thread people just need to look at the basics such as composiiton, pose, light, cropping and editing to see that a photo can be improved in many ways.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="psilo, post: 1650484, member: 5984"] LOL Roy excellent thread though I doubt that your b etter photographs are the result of a fluke. Noone can get consistently good shots and not understand a good level of photography. I think that the only way anyone can learn how to take better photographs is to learn how to effectively critique their own work. I think alot of people take them with little thought or maybe just seem to resign themselves to the fact that they will never really improve but just enjoy doing it anyway. I do not think this is a positive way of thinking. We should all be critical and be able to evaluate what we produce. Photography is never static. Nobody ever learns everything but it is the challenge of trying and learning new things that keeps you interested. As you have shown with this thread people just need to look at the basics such as composiiton, pose, light, cropping and editing to see that a photo can be improved in many ways. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Photo Critique
Critique needed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top