What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Crossbills
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RoyW" data-source="post: 1939380" data-attributes="member: 71737"><p>There are some interesting views raised in this thread, and in the links that have been posted. It is certainly an area that warrants further study in all species mentioned, but particularly in Crossbills where there <em>may</em> be sympatric speciation taking place. As to whether or not there are currently more species of Crossbill that should be recognised (or perhaps <em>less</em> species), it is obviously possible to argue the point from both sides. IMO a lot more needs to be known before we can really come to any conclusions about whether Crossbills of different call types & bill sizes really recognise each other as different species. If call types are the only way we can really tell them apart (because of overlap in measurements etc - <em>regardless of whether the measurements are statistically different</em>), and call types can be changed (eg. breeding pairs matching calls), then how can we <u>know</u> that there is not much mixing?</p><p>If bill size affects the food that each bird can most easily feed on, it is not surprising that birds with similar bill sizes are found feeding, <u>and breeding</u>, in the same areas/times of year. Birds with different bill sizes may choose to breed at other times simply because they breed when food availability is at it's best (dependent on the type of trees present). </p><p></p><p>Of course, those who support the idea that there are several 'cryptic' species that we can't readily tell apart may well be correct - they just haven't proved their case yet!</p><p>Personally I don't feel that birders have to be able to tell two birds apart for them to be valid species (as has been said, it's whether the birds themselves consider themselves sufficiently different that matters - but if the birds can 'switch', or choose different partners in different circumstances, then they are <u>not</u> different species).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RoyW, post: 1939380, member: 71737"] There are some interesting views raised in this thread, and in the links that have been posted. It is certainly an area that warrants further study in all species mentioned, but particularly in Crossbills where there [I]may[/I] be sympatric speciation taking place. As to whether or not there are currently more species of Crossbill that should be recognised (or perhaps [I]less[/I] species), it is obviously possible to argue the point from both sides. IMO a lot more needs to be known before we can really come to any conclusions about whether Crossbills of different call types & bill sizes really recognise each other as different species. If call types are the only way we can really tell them apart (because of overlap in measurements etc - [I]regardless of whether the measurements are statistically different[/I]), and call types can be changed (eg. breeding pairs matching calls), then how can we [U]know[/U] that there is not much mixing? If bill size affects the food that each bird can most easily feed on, it is not surprising that birds with similar bill sizes are found feeding, [U]and breeding[/U], in the same areas/times of year. Birds with different bill sizes may choose to breed at other times simply because they breed when food availability is at it's best (dependent on the type of trees present). Of course, those who support the idea that there are several 'cryptic' species that we can't readily tell apart may well be correct - they just haven't proved their case yet! Personally I don't feel that birders have to be able to tell two birds apart for them to be valid species (as has been said, it's whether the birds themselves consider themselves sufficiently different that matters - but if the birds can 'switch', or choose different partners in different circumstances, then they are [U]not[/U] different species). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Crossbills
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top