What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Crystalline clarity of the HT ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bwana1" data-source="post: 3419659" data-attributes="member: 134023"><p>Exactly :t: </p><p>As a new member I've been so intimidated to use the wrong terminology, that I only ask questions of a basic nature so my optically challenged tongue doesn't get called into question. Some of us aren't eloquent enough to connect the eye muscle to the tongue...and then to the keyboard. I wish I could, but then again would prefer to be able to play a guitar like Eric Clapton...but alas I suck at that too :king:</p><p></p><p>My point wasn't to derail SD's thread, nor cause a rift on the board...but instead to remind the terminology police that the hobby is about fun. Our passions are about the "object" that we're viewing with optics, the optics just allow us to do it...and enjoy our hobby. I have owned alpha glass for over 20 years, and yet feel like a babe in the woods here...but learning and being challenged is part of the game.</p><p></p><p>We appreciate the "Binoheads" here that slug it out over the tiny bits of this & that...we really do. I have been dumbfounded at the arguing and debate that takes place at times, thinking everyone's eyes see things differently. When a thread has 6k views, and 9 posters...you might have left the rest of us at the curbside somewhere.</p><p></p><p>I have been fortunate enough to reach out to great members for advice, and been treated like an old friend...but you can see that in their posts, they are passive and knowledgeable. I was so confused in the SF thread, I reached out to Lee (Troubador) for help...without his thoughtful explanations and advice, I'd still be on page 47...Thank you Lee <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Use whatever words fit the bill, use what expresses your viewpoint. Someone said <em>"those words are emotions, not scientific terms" </em>...that's right, I get emotional enjoyment out of seeing my quarry,,,when it becomes stale and scientific to me, I'll quit and find another hobby.</p><p></p><p>Best wishes,</p><p>Eric</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bwana1, post: 3419659, member: 134023"] Exactly :t: As a new member I've been so intimidated to use the wrong terminology, that I only ask questions of a basic nature so my optically challenged tongue doesn't get called into question. Some of us aren't eloquent enough to connect the eye muscle to the tongue...and then to the keyboard. I wish I could, but then again would prefer to be able to play a guitar like Eric Clapton...but alas I suck at that too :king: My point wasn't to derail SD's thread, nor cause a rift on the board...but instead to remind the terminology police that the hobby is about fun. Our passions are about the "object" that we're viewing with optics, the optics just allow us to do it...and enjoy our hobby. I have owned alpha glass for over 20 years, and yet feel like a babe in the woods here...but learning and being challenged is part of the game. We appreciate the "Binoheads" here that slug it out over the tiny bits of this & that...we really do. I have been dumbfounded at the arguing and debate that takes place at times, thinking everyone's eyes see things differently. When a thread has 6k views, and 9 posters...you might have left the rest of us at the curbside somewhere. I have been fortunate enough to reach out to great members for advice, and been treated like an old friend...but you can see that in their posts, they are passive and knowledgeable. I was so confused in the SF thread, I reached out to Lee (Troubador) for help...without his thoughtful explanations and advice, I'd still be on page 47...Thank you Lee ;) Use whatever words fit the bill, use what expresses your viewpoint. Someone said [I]"those words are emotions, not scientific terms" [/I]...that's right, I get emotional enjoyment out of seeing my quarry,,,when it becomes stale and scientific to me, I'll quit and find another hobby. Best wishes, Eric [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Crystalline clarity of the HT ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top