• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Death Of The Alpha? (1 Viewer)

The-Wanderer

Well-known member
Tract gives the eye relief as 19mm, presumably real. On the other hand, for apparently the same Kamakura base, marketed by Opticron, the quoted eye relief is 22mm, effective.

If these figures are correct the difference in the models is significant.
 
Last edited:

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter
Tract gives the eye relief as 19mm, presumably real. On the other hand, for apparently the same Kamakura base, marketed by Opticron, the quoted eye relief is 22mm, effective.

If these figures are correct the difference in the models is significant.
I wonder if the eyecups are the same length on the Opticron as the Tract? That could be too much eye relief. Also, I wonder if the Opticron has a polymer or magnesium frame.
 

Grando

Well-known member
The Opticron looks interesting. Thanks. I should say I'm not particularly in the market for a new pair of bins at the moment, but posted in answer to the statement regarding the death of the alpha. And all I can say is that, looking through the Zeiss SFs and new Noctovids at the weekend, reports of their death have been greatly exagerated. Both appear to be fantastic bins that I would love to own. These Tracts, Mavens, Opticrons may well also be fantastic binoculars, but I don't think they will render the top-end offerings redundant... It's obvious that a £2000 binocular is not 4 times better than a £500 binocular - we all know that there is a law of diminishing returns. Now, depending on many factors, potential buyers may decide that forking out a small fortune for a small incremental increase is not worth it, but for others that small increase will be worth the extra x hundred pounds. So, can we agree that the premise of this thread is ridiculous: so-called alpha binoculars are not and will probably never be dead; they may be overpriced, but that's a very different statement...
 

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter
The Opticron looks interesting. Thanks. I should say I'm not particularly in the market for a new pair of bins at the moment, but posted in answer to the statement regarding the death of the alpha. And all I can say is that, looking through the Zeiss SFs and new Noctovids at the weekend, reports of their death have been greatly exagerated. Both appear to be fantastic bins that I would love to own. These Tracts, Mavens, Opticrons may well also be fantastic binoculars, but I don't think they will render the top-end offerings redundant... It's obvious that a £2000 binocular is not 4 times better than a £500 binocular - we all know that there is a law of diminishing returns. Now, depending on many factors, potential buyers may decide that forking out a small fortune for a small incremental increase is not worth it, but for others that small increase will be worth the extra x hundred pounds. So, can we agree that the premise of this thread is ridiculous: so-called alpha binoculars are not and will probably never be dead; they may be overpriced, but that's a very different statement...
I personally liked the Tract Toric 8x42 and Maven B.2 9x45 better overall than my SV 8x32 and 10x50. I saw no small incremental increase in performance with the SV's outside of the slightly sharper edges on the SV but you pay for that with RB. Let me tell you I really appreciate the smooth focus on the Tract and the Maven.
 

Iceberg slim

You ent sin me roit.....
Am i going to see plenty Am/Canadian birders at Pelee (may 17) sporting these super unobtainable Binoculars, looking fwd to duking it out to the bitter end....B :)8-P
 

Pinewood

New York correspondent
United States
Am i going to see plenty Am/Canadian birders at Pelee (may 17) sporting these super unobtainable Binoculars, looking fwd to duking it out to the bitter end....B :)8-P

Hello Martin,

I have never seen bird watchers engaged in violence. Of course, I have never been at a British twitch. Here in the former colonies we engage in upturned noses. verbal slights, cutting remarks and silence. I think we learned these responses from the more genteel elements of British society.
I can attest that there are few owners of that Austrian brand who would be rather averse to looking through anything else.

Happy bird watching,
Arthur :hi:
 

Iceberg slim

You ent sin me roit.....
Hello Martin,

I have never seen bird watchers engaged in violence. Of course, I have never been at a British twitch. Here in the former colonies we engage in upturned noses. verbal slights, cutting remarks and silence. I think we learned these responses from the more genteel elements of British society.
I can attest that there are few owners of that Austrian brand who would be rather averse to looking through anything else.

Happy bird watching,
Arthur :hi:

...You obviously picked up my satirical word play, how ironic, #NoctividsroolGB
 

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter
Tract gives the eye relief as 19mm, presumably real. On the other hand, for apparently the same Kamakura base, marketed by Opticron, the quoted eye relief is 22mm, effective.

If these figures are correct the difference in the models is significant.
Just because Kamakura built them doesn't mean they are identical. They could be way different builds.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top